Law & Legal Issues

What is the definition of Judicial Interpretations?


Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
2014-09-17 22:16:46
2014-09-17 22:16:46

Judicial Interpretation is the method of explaining how the judiciary interprets the law precisely the constitutional documents. There are several approaches like: textualist approach, developmentalist approach and doctrinal approach.


Related Questions

Judicial means to judge. The courts have judges. This is the definition of judicial.

Laws passed by Congress and judicial decisions are two things that have caused new interpretations of the Constitution. A changing and evolving society is another cause.

A judicial decision that may be used as a standard in subsequent similar cases.

Judicial is pertaining to judgement of courts of justice or to the administration of justice. Judicial can also pertain to a judge, or person who oversees a court.

re-word your question. it makes no sense and I cannot understand it.

Judicial release is releasing something early by a judge. If someone is in jail for 5 years and is let out for good behavior this is called judicial release.

A crime is a criminal act committed with a criminal intent.

Power of a court to determine the constitutionality of a government action.

Refers to pertaining judgment in courts of justice or to the administration of justice

yes assessment is a synonym for judicial review considering it definition: Power of a court to adjudicate The constitutionality of laws Of a government

The Judicial branch has "referee" powers - that is, it is involved with deciding disputes over legal interpretations. It has no formal powers to pass laws (though, in deciding legal interpretations, it may declare certain legal responsibilities which some may interpret as "legislating from the bench"), nor does it have any ability to physically enforce its decrees (which is a function left to the Executive branch). In addition, its membership is determined by the other two branches (Executive appoints Judicial members, with Legislative approval).

Judicial prevention of a statement or other expression from being published.

The definition of the branches of the government is separation of power of the government. The three branches are the legislative branch, the judicial branch, and the executive branch

An example of the United States modern government theory of check and balance. Judicial review is the process under which the legislative and executive actions of the modern government are subject to review by the judicial branch of said government.

The separation of powers is the division between the legislative, executive and judicial branches.

Judicial restraint is the philosophy that judges and justices should defer to written legislation whenever possible, if it is not in conflict with the Constitution. A justice who uses judicial restraint tends to take a narrower view of the Constitution and does not attempt to broaden the definition of Amendments to fit a particular social or political agenda. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. For more information on the debate between judicial activism and judicial restrain, see Related Links, below.

Of course. The habitual narrow interpretations of law stunts its growth as society matures. Broader interpretations allow the courts to render decisions that are more in step with modern culture and changing views. For example, modern interpretations are making it more and more difficult for some jurisdictions to justify discrimination against individuals for reasons of race, gender, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, etc.

Article III of United States constitution deals with judicial branch, judicial powers and the definition and punishment of treason. It defines the structure of judicial branch, tenures of judges, issue of salaries of judges and number of courts.

an act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.

Congress has two major abilities to check the actions of the Judicial branch:Congress must approve of any appointment to the Federal judiciary, so Congress can control the membership of the judiciary.Congress can pass new laws which take into account prior judicial rulings to redefine future judicial interpretations. So long as the law does not run afoul of Constitutional prohibitions, Congress can pass a law which changes how the Judicial branch must view a particular legal topic.

Dictionary: The action of condemning; judicial conviction; expression of disapprobation ( moral condemnation); a sentence of forfeiture.

The executive branch ( i.e. the President) appoints the Supreme Courrt justices and federal judges ( subject to senate confirmation) and he tries to appoint people who agree with his judicial philosophy and interpretations of the Constitution. After the judges are appointed, the executive branch has no direct power over them.

U.S. Government positions which are not in the competitive service, including those in the legislative, judicial, and executive branches.

The simple definition is the Judicial Branch of the government is to interpret laws and decide if they follow the guidelines as it is laid out to the Constitution. The Legislative Branch makes the laws, the Executive Branch is to enforce the laws.

The answer got many different interpretations from the crowd.

Copyright ยฉ 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.