Something is wrong if it hurts someone in any way: emotionally, physically, economically, reputation-wise, image-wise, etc.
Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of an act.
That's more like a theorem. A fact is something that can't be proven wrong.QuestionThen how come a common saying is "you have your facts wrong", when facts cannot be wrong by definition?
There are so many divergent views of morality that some are bound to be wrong. Hence, many people may act out of a sense of morality, but they are not really doing what is right. But the quote by Asimov might be a bit more deep...people often rationalize their actions so that they twist their sense of morality to just do whatever they feel like doing, regardless of whether or not its right or wrong.
Since this is a philosophical question, I can only give a philosophical answer. I feel it is better to be wrong for the right reason rather than to be right for the wrong reason. If one is wrong for the right reason, then I feel they at least had good intentions. If one is right for the wrong reason, then I would have to wonder if their intentions were the right ones in the first place. But the really important thing, in my "philosophical" answer, is for one to be able and willing to admit when they are wrong.
you can not be wrong and write at the same time it is impossible
for doing somthing wrong
Somebody who teaches right from wrong.
The movie Mr. mom
A 'scapegoat' is someone who is blamed for some wrong-doing, which was did by others.
Conscienceless or Immoral.... Consciencetious
Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of an act.
you may not be doing the cheat right. and if you are doing it right then you might be doing it in the wrong place.
they are all internally conflicted between doing right and wrong
One of the pieces of advice for peace and inner strength that are given in the Analects is to do right, not just by vowing not to do wrong. This means that doing the right thing is far more important than simply not doing the wrong thing, simply not doing the wrong thing is taking no action, while doing the right thing is being proactive.
Ethics
Morals
Redress is to set right, often by making compensation for a wrong.