A constitution is a document, explaining the rules, regulation, and setup of a constutional goverment. A constutional gov. is built around the blueprint of the constution.
This is a ridiculous question, obviously a constitutional government has a constitution that is the basis for it's law.
An unconstitutional government does not.
They are both in countries
an example of shared power
A republic versus a constitutional monarchy.
While a Constitutional government is often a limited government, they are not always one and the same. A constitutional government contains formal documents that define its institutions and powers of the government. By that definition, the constitution is limited; however, there are clauses and changes that are often able to be made which allows the government to operate under its constitution but still be able to move.
A constitutional government follows a constitution, which is an outline/framework of the government. That means that the country cannot disobey the constitution, however, they can modify/change it in a process that the constitution allows. For example, in the US, if the constitution wants to be changed by adding an amendment, 3/4 of the states need to vote in favor. A dictatorial government is one that is completely run by a dictator. They get to do whatever they want and do not follow anything but their own choices. Such an example would be Nazi Germany, run by Hitler.
While a Constitutional government is often a limited government, they are not always one and the same. A constitutional government contains formal documents that define its institutions and powers of the government. By that definition, the constitution is limited; however, there are clauses and changes that are often able to be made which allows the government to operate under its constitution but still be able to move.
What are the differences between the US Constitution and the confederacy of the Iroquois Nation?What are the differences between the US Constitution and the confederacy of the Iroquois Nation?
What are the differences between the united states constitution and the norway constitution?
A constitutional Government is obliged to work within the frame work of what it is authorised to do according to rules set out in the constitution. A non constitutional government can do whatever it wants.
To be a constitutional government you would need a constitution. ____________ The US has a famous constitution, even if its value and authority are eroding over time. It is a single document written for the express purpose of establishing a government based on the premise that governmental authority is derived from the consent of the governed, and ideally all other laws in the US are in line with constitutional principles. The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy, and therefore a constitutional government. The monarch is head of state and has a number of functions. The monarch has a little more power and authority than is widely known, but wisely monarchs seldom use them. The system in the UK is different from the US system in that there is no single document that is considered 'the constitution'. But the UK holds to a system of laws (some of them truly ancient, and the basis for much law in western cultures) and processes that guarantee the orderly exercise of government under a law that protects all.
Nothing they are the same.
federalA bi-level republic would fit the bill.