What is the difference between an employee and a sub-contractor?
Basically an employee is TOLD what to do, how and when to do it. Is paid by the time doing it and has taxes taken out.
An independent contractor just completes the job, provides his own tools and does it when and how he wants it.
For more details go to then scroll down to the links for more details on independent contractor defintions
The situation concerning whether someone is an independent contractor or an employee has caused much debate in the UK courts. I have recently won a case involving legal argument on employee status. My arguments followed the principles outlined below.
Under a contract of service a person agrees to serve another - under a contract for services a person agrees to provide certain services for another. A contract of service is normally referred to as a contract of employment.
Contract of employment must contain three elements without which a contract cannot be regarded as a contract of employment:
- the contract must impose an obligation on a person to provide work personally
- there must be a mutuality of obligation between employer and employee
- the worker must expressly or impliedly agree to be subject to the control of the person for whom h works to a sufficient degree to make that person master.
Personal Obligation to provide Work
In Express and Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton IRLR
The Court of Appeal held that the power to send a substitute meant that this could not be a contract of employment. The irreducible minimum of a contract was for the worker to provide his services personally.
However, where a contract contains a limited power to delegate, that does not lead to an inescapable conclusion that it is not a contract of employment.
MacFarlane v Glasgow City Council IRLR7. EAT
According to the EAT in Macfarlane, the clause in Tanton allowing the worker to send a replacement was extreme. The worker in Tanton was not under any obligation to attend work. He was always entitled to send a substitute. In MacFarlane the worker was only entitled to send a replacement in the event that he was unable to attend work himself. Therefore the clause was of a far more limited effect and was not sufficient of itself to justify the conclusion that the contract was not a contract of employment.
Staffordshire Sentinel Newspapers Ltd v Potter  IRLR 752
The EAT gave further guidance on the application of Tanton and MacFarlane. The critical question is what is the relevant express term; where there is no clear express term in writing then it may be necessary to look at the overall factual matrix in order to discern that term.
The decision of the EAT in McFarlane v Glasgow City Council, that a contract did not cease to be a contract for personal service simply because, in the absence of an express contractual term dealing with personal service or the use of substitutes, there was, as a matter of fact, a right to substitute in a limited sense, was entirely consistent with the ruling of the Court of Appeal in Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton that an express right to provide a substitute was wholly inconsistent with a contract of service.
Mutuality of Obligations
This means that for the duration of the contract both the employer and the employee must be under a legal obligation to each other. (Carmichael v National Power PLC  IRLR 43) The employee is under an obligation to provide labour for which the employer is under an obligation to provide payment.
This does not mean that the work must be carried out under the employer's supervision, it requires that the ultimate authority over the worker in the performance of her work resides in the employer, so that the employee is subject to the latter's orders and directions.
I hope this is helpful.
I live in Virginia. I had to fight to get my workers comp benefits. There were four criteria which classified me as an employee versus an independent contractor.
1) I was told when to report to work
2) I was told when to quit my day's work
3) I was trained by the person who I worked for
4) They had the ability to fire me
It's not necessary for the person you are working for to take out your taxes. This can already be agreed upon between you and your employer.
If your employer fills out the invoices and you never do, chances are you are an employee.
A subcontractor may also be an independent contractor. A subcontractor situation happens when an employer places a contract with a person (or company) to have some work done. If that person (or company) then places a contract with another person (or company) to have all or perhaps a specialist part of the original work done, then that second person (or company) is a subcontractor. From the employers point of view, he only pays the person…
a nominated subcontractor, with various provisions for obtaining indemnities by the subcontractor (or Employer) but under the main contractor responsibility and coordination, or ** another contractor, which FIDIC provides the incumbent Main Contractor is required to give site access, etc, etc to but coordinated by the Employer My own understanding, very simply put is that a nominated subcontractor is actually a "normal" subcontract between Main Contractor and Subcontractor, BUT that the nominated subcontractor is selected…
Can a subcontractor for termite treatment on a Hollywood Florida home put a lien on the house when the contractor was paid in full but will not pay the subcontractor?
Not likely. There is no privity of contract between the homeowner and the subcontractor. The homeowner had an agreement with the general contractor, and that's the only person they have a duty to pay. The subcontractor can only pursue payment from the general contractor - to put a lien on the home would be to punish an innocent party - the homeowner. This is between the subcontractor and the general contractor, and there's no reason…
Can a subcontractor hire another subcontractor and put a lien on property if second subcontrctor is replaced?
A subcontractor can hire another subcontractor but can only put a lien on the property if the original subcontractor isn't paid. The lien can also be placed if the second subcontractor was not paid because of the original subcontractor was not paid. The replacement of the second subcontractor is not grounds for a lien.
Can a subcontractor hire another subcontractor and put a lien on property if second subcontractor is replaced even with a signed contract?
No a subcontractor can hire another subcontractor and put a lien on the property if the second subcontractor is replaced even with a signed contract. The replacement of the second contractor is not purpose to place a lien on the property. The subcontractor can only place a lien on the property if they were not paid due to the original subcontractor not being paid.
Can a subcontractor hire another subcontractor and put a lien on property if second subcontractor is replaced?
Question is in Factory or establishment if a person is working as a cost accountant then what is his status. Whether he is a workman or employee. Difference between an employee and workman is that they are differently treated. A workman is governed by Industrial law whereas the other class are governed by service rules.
Are you the contractor, the subcontractor, or the person who hired the contractor in the first place? If you're the person who hired the general contractor, you don't have to do anything - this is between the general contractor and the subcontractor. As long as you pay the contractor the agreed-upon price, you can wash your hands of the matter. If you're the subcontractor, and the general contractor who hired you is not paying what…