soft hrm is the hrm approach that sees employees as valuable assets and means by which they can get competitive advantage and so therefore they believe in employee commitment and engagements. they could invest in employee by training them, building their careers etc.
hard hrm on the other hand, sees the employee as cost and resources that they can use to get maximum returns. hence, they don't see the need of investing in them, rather the employees are being used as resources that they can get maximum returns from them.
There are two main models of HRM which are known as soft and hard models. The soft model pays attention to individual productivity while the hard model looks at the entire team's performance and objectives among other things. .
HRM is generally considered to be either Hard or Soft where hard HRM is quantitative, calculative and treats people as a factor of production (an object). Soft HRM on the other hand draws from the Human Resource school of thought which treats people as strategic resources who can provide an organisation with strategic flexibility through being committed, innovative and working in a team so as to achieve a competitive advantage.The Harvard Model is considered to be more soft in nature because it views individuals as potential assets or humanassets rather than variable costs.
Human Resource Management is a discipline within business. The Society for Human Resource Management is a professional organization for human resource professionals.
One of the important function of HRM is the protection and security of employees. HRM is responsible for hiring, training, management and development of employees.
putting the right person at the right job on the right time is called hrm.
pwnage
The difference between IHRM and HRM is that IHRM deals with much broader perspective while HRM deals with narrow perspective.
A key concept is that of Hard and Soft HRM: Storey has differentiated between hard and soft outlines of HRM, typified by the Michigan and Harvard models correspondingly. 'Hard' HRM focuses on the supply side of human resources. It laid emphasis on costs in the structure of headcounts and places manage determinedly in the hands of management. Their position is to administer numbers effectively, keeping the personnel intimately matched with requirements in stipulations of both bodies and performance. 'Soft' HRM, conversely, stresses the human aspects of HRM. Its apprehensions are with communication and inspiration. People are led more willingly than managed. They are engaged in determining and realizing deliberate objectives.
There are two main models of HRM which are known as soft and hard models. The soft model pays attention to individual productivity while the hard model looks at the entire team's performance and objectives among other things. .
Human resources management
HRM is generally considered to be either Hard or Soft where hard HRM is quantitative, calculative and treats people as a factor of production (an object). Soft HRM on the other hand draws from the Human Resource school of thought which treats people as strategic resources who can provide an organisation with strategic flexibility through being committed, innovative and working in a team so as to achieve a competitive advantage.The Harvard Model is considered to be more soft in nature because it views individuals as potential assets or humanassets rather than variable costs.
Human Resource Management The paper discusses HRM rationale, history, key areas and practice, difference between hard and soft models, and their international tendencies. It concludes that models be based on the culture and demographic characteristics of the target organization. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1860053/human_resource_management.html
There is a big difference between manpower planning and human resource planning. In HRP the managers concerned with motivating people - a process in which cost,numbers,control and systems interact and play a part. In Manpower planning the managers concerned with the numerical elements of forecasting supply,demand matching and control ,in which people are a part.
dont.know.....i also want to now it
Hard vs Soft HRMHuman resource management is a vital function of any organization as people constitute an invaluable asset that needs to be harnessed to further the goals of the organization. Two contrasting theories of HRM have been put forward as an approach to tackle work force in a company that are called Hard HRM and Soft HRM. People are often confused between these two approaches as they lie on two extremes of management. This article will differentiate between the two styles of human resource management, hard HRM and soft HRM, with their pros and cons to enable managers to adopt a style that is a good mix of both.In fact HRM seems to be a vague concept, mostly because of conflicting views and theories proposed to define it. However, the good thing is that whether Hard or Soft HRM, both accept that human resources are critical for the success of any business. An organization gets competitive advantage over others only when it utilizes its human resources effectively, making use of their expertise, keeping them sufficiently motivated to achieve organizational goals.It was Storey in 1989 who elaborated on the Michigan and Harvard models on management (1960). Harvard and Michigan propounded theory X and Theory Y to explain two different styles of HRM. Theory X is a classic distrust approach of management where people are viewed as lazy working on their self interests. This approach says that the interests of company and employees are completely opposite and it is the duty of management to induce changes in the behavior of the employees to further company's goals. This is essentially a carrot and stick policy. Theory X focuses on the nature of the organization without paying any attention to the nature of the employees who are labeled as lazy. This approach regards people as machinery and it is the task of the management to make best use of them. This is Michigan model or Hard HRM.Theory Y is totally opposite to Theory X and perceives men as having emotions, feelings and motivations. They are not mere machines and take active interest in work as they achieve personal realization through work. Managers must try to keep their motivation high and enable them to realize their potential. This approach says that people are not inherently lazy and are in fact self responsible. They can be proactive and creative and management must encourage, and not coerce them to further the goals of the organization. This approach of HRM is called the Harvard model or Soft HRM.Unfortunately, neither of the two approaches of HRM work perfectly as neither represents reality because people can behave in different ways and cannot be categorized as machines or responsible fellows merely. This means that a good manager must adhere to a style of his own taking some points from Hard HRM and some points from Soft HRM to have an approach that is a good mix of the two and suits his requirements and personality.Hard HRM vs Soft HRM• Hard and Soft HRM are two contrasting styles of HRM• While Hard HRM focuses on the organization, Soft HRM focuses on the interests of the employees• Hard HRM sees people as lazy and merely resources to be utilized to further the goals of the organization. On the other hand, Soft HRM sees people as responsible and having feelings, emotions and motivation• Unfortunately neither approach works perfectly in reality and a good mix of both the styles must be adopted.
Culinary is for cooking dishes with arts or style. While HRM is to manage the restaurant with knowledge also on cooking, but it's focusing on management .
Human resource management and personnel management are basically the same thing with HRM being the more modern version. The differences between them deal with the approach they each take to the same situations with HRM being the more employee friendly model.