Asked by Andy Blackwell Uncategorized
What is the document that states the facts of a supreme cout case and gives the ruling?
We need you to answer this question!
If you know the answer to this question, please register to join our limited beta program and start the conversation right now!
Asked in Legal Documents
How do you prove someone has perjured themselves on a legal document?
With tangible evidence that shows they lied on the legal document. The evidence would need to show the true facts to counter the perjury. With tangible evidence that shows they lied on the legal document. The evidence would need to show the true facts to counter the perjury. With tangible evidence that shows they lied on the legal document. The evidence would need to show the true facts to counter the perjury. With tangible evidence that shows they lied on the legal document. The evidence would need to show the true facts to counter the perjury.
When a previous case is distinguished from the facts about a case presented to a court how must the court proceed?
Asked in US Supreme Court
Is the supreme court an apellate court?
The US Supreme Court is an appellate court, and therefore does not try cases or determine facts of the case, rather it interprets facts of law, and may grant new trials. There is no right to an appeal in front of the Supreme Court, it has discretionary authority, and will only grant writs of certiorari in cases of prominence involving the US Constitution. The other courts of appeals in the federal system are the Circuit Courts, which must hear cases. However, in some states, such as New York, the Supreme Court is the trial court, the lowest court in the jurisdiction.
Asked in Law & Legal Issues
Why an attorney of a defendant files a motion to reconsider the judge ruling with a supporting memorandum of law and facts?
Asked in African-American History, Slavery
What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
What are facts about Orthodoxy?
Asked in Government
What are facts about the American Government?
Why shouldn't the US Supreme Court be able to substitute its own factual determination for those in a jury in a lower court?
The Supreme Court has a very specific function, which is to interpret the US Constitution and its application to specific cases. Determination of facts is a specific function of juries. Therefore, the Supreme Court will respect the determination of facts made by a jury, and will limit itself to interpretation of relevant constitutional issues.
Asked in History, Politics & Society
What are facts that show that Parthenon is much older than the supreme court?
There are actually many facts that point to the Parthenon's obvious age over the Supreme Court, but I will name five here. 1. The Parthenon was built by the Greeks. This is an obvious one. The Supreme Court wasn't built until 1935. 2. The Parthenon has been worn down a bit by time. The Supreme Court? Not so much. 3. The Supreme Court was based on the structure of the Parthenon, not the other way around. 4. The Parthenon is more open-air, in some ways, than the Supreme Court. 5. The Parthenon has Greek statues of gods and goddesses, whereas the Supreme Court does not.