First, there is the lack of choice. If there are only two parties, then they must reach towards the majority of the country. Therefore, they need to not have extreme views, so they both are very similar because their options are limited.
Second, by only having two parties, it limits the potential for change. New ideas that don't follow the norm will most likely be thrown out than be adopted by the two major parties. The policies and the government change very little over time due to the two parties being so closely related.
Third, the two party system does not always provide the best leaders. Each party wants to win, so they will pick the person who has the best chance of winning. That being said, these people they choose may not always be the best leader.
A two-party system limits the candidates chances of winning who are not on the ballot as a Democrat or Republican, because these parties are so well-known. Another weakness of the two-party system is the cost of running in an election. Money is raises from fund-raisers or soliciting, and many times the focus is on raising money instead of the issues at hand.
The firm and unwavering belief that the other party is always wrong with no exceptions.
The main disadvantage of wired system is that they are very complex. The wiring increases the complexity of the systems.
..
False. Two-party systems are actually most common in English-speaking countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom. French-speaking countries, like France and Canada, often have multiparty systems with multiple major political parties.
the two-party system
none
two
Two
Two
Competition among leadership
Competition among leadership
Competition among leadership
single party- Dictatorship two party system- United States of America Multi-party system- like British Parliment