There can be no sensible answer. Litres are a measure of volume, not of mass. Consider a litre of air: what would its mass be? Next consider a litre of water. It will not have the same mass as the air.
A = W x L Width = 300 divided by L (or W = 300/L)
300 Cubits was the Length of the Ark
The estimated mass of 300 ml is about 300 grams. This can change based on the temperature and the density of the sample.
0.3 L
You calculate this type of problem by the general rule that 1 KL = 1000 L , so if you have 300 L, you do 300 L multiplied by 1 KL, and then the answer divided by 1000 L, which will equal to 0.3 KL .
No, litres is a unit of volume and kilograms is a unit of mass. These are not comparable unless you know the density of the material you are measuring. Water has an approximate density of 1 kg/L, so 300 L of water is approximately 300 kg.
A = W x L Width = 300 divided by L (or W = 300/L)
300 mL is 0.3 L
it would need 300 L
A person who weighs 300 pounds on Earth has 300 poundmass of mass, or about 136.1 kilograms.
300 kilograms
300 Cubits was the Length of the Ark
This is not a valid comparison; milligrams (mg) is a measure of weight or mass while milliliters (mL or ml) measure volume.
The estimated mass of 300 ml is about 300 grams. This can change based on the temperature and the density of the sample.
Yes. 300 mL is less than 2 L2 L = 2000 mL > 300 mL
0.5 L is more than 300 mL0.5 L = 500 mL > 300 mL
3000kg. kilograms is a measurement for mass.