0
What is the opportunity cost of doing and MBA or MPA in an universitysay you decide to attempt to do the busines economics unit without recommended text bookwhat would be the oppor. cost of doing so?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
please give the answer
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Read the introduction to this bookwhat kind of story is it?
the begining of a story
When shannon has read two fifths of the bookwhat fraction will she still have left to read?
3/5 would remain. 1 - 2/5 = 3/5.
After reading a book you have to write an essay on perception of this bookwhat does this mean?
I think your teacher wants you to write what you thought of the book - what was its theme, what were its main plot areas and what did you think about them? In other words, what do YOU think the book was about?
What did William the Conqueror invent?
William the conqueror or William I is a very well known king he came up with the feudal system and the dooms day bookwhat is the feudal system?is the name of the power structure in the middle agesWhat is the Domesday book?is the list of what property and cattle was owned in the middle ages
What are the different ways to ask who wrote a book?
Alternates for questions asking about the author of a book:There are many different ways to ask who wrote a book on WikiAnswers.For example, start withWho wrote The Jungle Book?"Who wrote" can be replaced with "Who wrote the book" or "Who was the author of""was" can be replaced with "is""author" can be replaced with "writer" or "creator""book" can be replaced with "novel" or "work"Putting these combinations together, some of the combinations we get are:Who wroteWho wrote the bookWho wrote the novelWho wrote the workWho was the author ofWho is the author ofWho was the writer ofWho is the the writer ofWhat was the name of the author ofWhat is the name of the author ofWhat was the name of the writer ofWhat is the name of the writer ofWhat was the name of the author of the bookWhat is the name of the author of the bookWhat was the name of the writer of the bookWhat is the name of the writer of the booketc...Other possibilities could include:Who is ... by?Who is ... written by?Who is ...'s author?There are many more possibilities than are listed here.Improved (but more technical) answer:Start with the following[Who] wrote [book]Have the following substitutions:[Who] = Who|Who [is] the [occupation] that|[Which] [occupation][is] = is|was[occupation] = author|writer[Which] = Which|What[book] = [book title]|the [bookObject][book title]|the [bookObject] [titled][book title][bookObject] = book|novel|story|work[titled] = titled|called|namedAdd questions:Who [is] the [occupation] of [book]What [is] the name of the [occupation] of [book]Who [is] [book][possessive] (passive voice)What [is] the name of [book][possessive][possessive] = by| written by|'s [occupation]Through this manner of substitutions alone, there should be 493 grammatically correct phrasings.
Do sikhs have a holy bookwhat is it called?
yes, sikhs do have a holy book. It is called the GURU GRANTH SAHIB. It has all the rules of sikhism and it is deeply respected by the sikh community. sikhs simbolize it as thier final guru
What to say when the conversation dies?
Ask random questions, then create a conversation from the answers given.Example questions:What is your favourite bookWhat is your favourite foodWhat is your favourite chocolateWhat is your favourite filmWhat is your favourite TV showWhat is your favourite animalWhat is the best cheese?What makes a good pie?Did you have any dreams last night? (To be cheeky, ask if you were in them)What was the reason you laughed last?What did you do today?Do you like dancing?Do you have tattoos or piercings? Would you consider getting some/more?What are your beliefs?How was sleep last night?What are your favourite childhood memories?And so onIf you're outside instead of stuck in a computer chat, make a conversation based on your surroundings:Comment on peoples clothesComment on buildingsMention the weatherSay the place looks niceAnd so on
In the westing game bookwhat was the object of the game?
The object of the game in "The Westing Game" was to solve the mystery of Samuel W. Westing's death and identify the heir who would inherit his fortune. As the story unfolds, the characters must decipher clues, work together, and navigate the twists and turns of the game to uncover the truth.
How do you take good notes on a book?
It depends on the kind of book and on how much you already know - and on what kind of memory you have.If you are thinking about scholarly works and already have some knowledge of the subject, often the most efficient kind of notes is a personalized index - that is, an index that meets your needs, interests and requirements. Above all don't waste time copying long chunks out of the book. It is pointless and gives you unduly long notes. A personalized index on the other hand tells you where to find information again when you need it.Here are some specific things you should be reading for (they're arranged in order of importance):What happens in the book (the main plot)Who the characters are - descriptions, goals and desires, and how they changeWhere and when the book is set (setting)What themes are explored in the bookWhat the mood or atmosphere of the book is like
What is the name of first lexicographer of the world?
Thomas B. Albright - SeeEither the question is wrong or the answer. I know English language, enough to say, the answer is wrong.No disrespect to Thomas B Albright.I do not know the answer, off hand but may be allowed to find it, later. This is to say, I shall work tenuously to be the first to answer the question, framed in the headline.To wit:Dept of Sanskrit lexicography at Deccan College Swati Shinde, TNN Nov 2, 2009, 03.08am ISTPUNE: The Deccan college post-graduate and research institute will set up country's first-ever Department of Sanskrit Lexicography, starting from academic year 2010-11. The department which will initially offer masters and doctorate courses in lexicography, will allow students to gain hands-on experience on the mammoth Sanskrit dictionary project, undertaken by the college way back in 1948.Lexicology is the science of the study of word whereas lexicography is the writing of the word in some concrete form i.e. in the form of dictionary. It also includes the history, theory, methodology and typology of dictionary-making.Director of the college Vinayaka Bhatta said, "For several years we have been working on the Sanskrit dictionary project. So, we realise the potential of lexicography in Sanskrit. Hence, we decided to set up a separate department for the subject. Also, the fact that there is no lexicography department or courses available exclusively for Sanskrit led us to set up one."There are several universities in the country that offer lexicography courses in various other languages namely - Punjabi, English and even Tamil. But not Sanskrit. The Sanskrit lexicography course will get underway from next year even as the department will be set up on the premises of Deccan college."Once the course gains publicity and the department expands, we intend to build a separate building and add more courses," Bhatta said.The Deccan College has undertaken the Sanskrit dictionary project which is described as one of world's biggest lexicography work having started in 1948 and expected to be completed in another 30 to 40 years from now.Unlike conventional dictionaries which deal with word meanings as static, one-item entries, this Sanskrit dictionary adopts a historical approach, a special feature in the field of lexicography. The project has already seen three generations of lexicographers at work and many more to go.The students applying for these courses will also gain hands-on experience on this mammoth project and further still they swill also get a chance to prepare their own dictionary as a project."There are several opportunities in the field today and a number of universities and colleges in the country and outside are involved in various projects related to lexicography. Also, students who pass out of this course can take up an initiative and prepare their own dictionaries," Bhatta said.Presently, the Deccan College has three departments functioning, namely the department of archaeology, department of linguistics and the Sanskrit dictionary project.Poona, India (City). University. Centre of Advanced Study in Linguistics0 ReviewsDeccan College, 1973 - Foreign Language Study - 131 pagesStudies in historical Sanskrit lexicography , Issue 3Studies in historical Sanskrit lexicography , Issue 3Poona, India (City). University. Centre of Advanced Study in Linguistics0 ReviewsDeccan College, 1973 - Foreign Language Study - 131 pagesFrom inside the bookWhat people are saying - Write a reviewWe haven't found any reviews in the usual places.Related booksBhaṭṭikāvya evaṃ Pāṇinīya vyākaraṇa kā tulanātmaka adhyayanaŚaśi BālāStudies in IndologySatyakāma VarmāThe wisdom of SaankhyaKrishna Prakash Bahadur, KapilaA century of Sanskrit journalismHira Lal ShuklaComponential analysis of meaningEugène Albert NidaCASS studies, Volume 5Ramchandra Narayan DandekarLiterature in the Vedic age, Volume 1Sukumari BhattacharjiThe practical Sanskrit-English dictionaryVāman Shivarām ĀpteContentsEtymology and Historical Dictionary of Sanskrit 112 1Sanskrit Historical Dictionary and Vedanta 1324 13Traditional Lexicons and Sanskrit Historical Dictionary 2539 254 other sections not shownOrigin of Lexicography reveals that there were two categories of lexicons: synonymous and homonymous. There were dictionaries that were written by poets like Banabhatta, Mayura, Murari and Sriharsa. The Nighantus contained nominal and verbal forms. The Koshas contained only nouns. The former dealt with one special text, the latter was based on any special text. Koshas are written in verse and it incorporates expressions from many of the arts which a poet was expected to have mastered. The composition of such works may have been promoted by existence of Dhatupathas and other lists of the grammarians.In synonymous lexicons words were grouped by subject-matter. Some of the important synonymous dictionaries included a homonymous section. As the books were aimed at learning, the principle of alphabetic order was not considered. They are divided accordingly on various principles. The longer articles may come first or the arrangement may be by the final consonants or the initial letters or both combined. In some cases information is given as to gender with an appendix on it. Homonyms may be treated in the same way. The older writers were indifferent to order. They were keen to give long definitions. However the later writers are unwilling to waste space and are proportionately unclear.(Last Updated on : 24/05/2011)Origin of Sanskrit LexicographyOrigin of Sanskrit Lexicography can be dated back to Nighantavas which is a collection of Vedic terms.Find in a libraryAll sellers »0 ReviewsWrite reviewWörterbücher: ein internationales Handbuch zur Lexikographie, Volume 3 edited by Franz Josef HausmannAbout this bookNew! Shop for Google eBooksGo to the Google eBookstore for over 3 million eBooks to read on the Web, Android, iPhone, iPad, Sony and Nook. Shop for eBooks now »eBookstorePages displayed by permission of Walter de Gruyter. Copyright.
What gives US citizens the right to own a gun?
Because they feel that they have the right to because it is written in the American constitution though most gun wielding Americans turn a blind eye to the fact that that section of the constitution was written just after Britain had left America so if Britain returned, America could mobilise an army extremely quickly as most citizens would have guns. Modern Americans don't have the threat of invasion looming over them so they have no reason to keep a gun. Many claim that having a gun is a form of protection but many shootings in America are either in the home between family members or the victim of the shooting is the owner of the gun.AnswerThe question implies that all (or most) Americans carry guns, which is not true. Depending on which source you reference, about 35% to 48% of Americans own at least one gun. According to a Gallup poll, 38% of Americans owned guns in 2005, and the number has held steady at approximately 40% since 2000. In fact, is has NEVER been true (not even at the time the U.S. was founded) that most Americans own guns. Even in colonial times, the majority of Americans did not own guns or even know how to shoot them.Moreover, having a gun is not the same as carryingone. While 40% of Americans may own guns, the majority of them don't carry them around with them everywhere they go. You need a special permit to carry your gun around with you. Most people are legally bound to leave their guns in their homes.So, the overwhelming majority of Americans do not carry guns. It's really pretty uncommon. It's the kind of thing you'd be surprised to learn about a person.And it is certainly not true that modern Americans have no reason to keep a gun. A lot of households in rural areas still hunt for their food. There are a lot of American families out there that would not eat if they did not own hunting rifles.What is often misunderstood about the 2nd Amendment is the intended use of guns. The 2nd Amendment was not solely intended to protect the U.S. from another British invasion (or any foreign invasion). It was also intended (perhaps even primarily intended) to protect American citizens from their own government.The 2nd Amendment says that, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." One of the definitions of "militia" (from dictionary.com) is, "abody of citizens organized ina paramilitary group andtypically regarding themselves asdefenders of individual rightsagainst the presumed interferenceof the federal government."The founding fathers wanted to make sure that, if their new government became corrupt, its citizens could fight and overthrow it, just as they had fought and overthrown British rule. At the time the U.S. was founded, the right to bear arms was considered of the utmost importance, not just to maintaining the country's independence, but to maintaining a just government.It is debatable whether "a well-regulated militia" is still "necessary to the security of a free state." Warfare has changed a lot since the American Revolution. Handguns, rifles, and even automatic and semi-automatic weapons would not stand a chance against the bombs and heavy artillery employed by modern armies. If Americans were to fight a war against their government nowadays, the government could easily just bomb the whole country.The question is: would they? Sure, the U.S. government could stop a modern-day revolution by bombing the whole country. But then there would be no country left. Bombing the entire country into ruins defeats the purpose of fighting for it. The government could bomb the land and win, but then they would have destroyed the entire country, leaving nothing of value left.One thing the U.S. has learned (or should have learned, rather) from its military history is to never underestimate the power of homegrown guerrilla warfare against an invading force. This is how the U.S. won the American Revolution, lost the Vietnam War, and ended up having way more trouble than it thought it would in the Iraq War.Of course, if Americans were to fight a modern-day revolution against their government, they would certainly be impeded by the fact that the U.S. army is not an invading force, but a force made up of fellow citizens. When planning and executing offensives in, say, Greenbrier County, West Virginia, the government could employ soldiers from Greenbrier County to help them. But the government would still have the disadvantage of attacking people on their home turf, in terrain that they know best. So it is certainly not a foregone conclusion that Americans don't need guns nowadays because guns would not help them overthrow a corrupt government.Furthermore (this really goes outside the scope of the question, but), banning guns doesn't necessarily make people safer. Criminals can get guns whether they are legal or not. So, outlawing guns often has the unintended effect of taking firearms away from law-abiding people, while leaving them in the hands of criminals.This is not to say that the United States does not have a problem with guns and gun control. But banning guns outright is not necessarily the solution. Many states do not have strict gun laws, and even when they do, gun dealers do not always follow them. Strict gun laws (and substantial civil and criminal penalties to ensure adherence to the laws) may be a more practical and effective solution than repealing the 2nd Amendment altogether.The founding fathers gave American citizens the right to bear arms because they believed it was essential to maintaining a just government. Rightly or wrongly, many Americans still believe this. History has shown that Americans can be downright paranoid about governmental intrusion upon their rights and liberties, and the belief that guns are essential to liberty is embedded into this innate mistrust of governmental authority.In today's times, there is also a definite "culture of fear" in the United States. The news media undoubtedly plays a major role in creating and maintaining this pervasive fear. Part of it is a quest for ratings: sensationalized stories about horrific crimes tend to grab people's attention. The other part of it is that the major news networks are often under the control of wealthy political figures who want to keep Americans in a permanent state of fear, because frightened people are easy to manipulate.As a result, a lot of Americans seem to have the idea that criminals are lurking in every shadow, waiting for the right moment to attack, rob and murder law-abiding citizens. While this fear may be justified in areas where crime is rampant, in most cases it is not. Yet the fear seems to persist regardless of local crime rates.
