answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The sum of the squares of the first 20 natural numbers 1 to 20 is 2,870.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the sum of the squares of the first 20 natural number1 to 20?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference between the sum of the squares of the first one hundred natural numbers and the square of the sum?

The sum of the squares of the first 100 natural numbers [1..100] is 338350, while the sum of the first 100 natural numbers squared is 25502500.


Sum of squares of first 1000 positive odd integers?

The sum of the squares of the first 1000 positive odd integers (from 12 to 19992) is 1333333000.


What is the sum of the squares of the first 20 natural numbers 1 to 20?

The sum of the first N square numbers is: N*(N+1)*(2N+1)/6 So putting N = 20 gives 2870.


What is the sum of the squares of the first 5 prime numbers?

88


What is the sum of the first 100 natural number?

The sum of the first 100 natural numbers is 5,001.


Who find the sum of first 57 natural number?

The sum of the first 57 natural numbers is 1,625.


What is the sum of 50 natural numbers?

The sum of the first 50 natural numbers is 1,251.


The sum of two positive numbers is 4 and the sum fo their cubes is 28 What is the sum of their squares?

The sum of their squares is 10.


Find the programming code for calculating the sum of the squares of the first 1000 numbers in HASKELL?

To get a list of the squares of the first 1000 numbers we can do:> [n^2 | n sum [n^2 | n


Find the sum of first ten natural number?

The sum of the first 10 natural numbers is 51.


What is sum of natural numbers between 200?

The sum of the first 200 natural numbers is 20,001.


If the regression sum of squares is large relative to the error sum of squares is the regression equation useful for making predictions?

If the regression sum of squares is the explained sum of squares. That is, the sum of squares generated by the regression line. Then you would want the regression sum of squares to be as big as possible since, then the regression line would explain the dispersion of the data well. Alternatively, use the R^2 ratio, which is the ratio of the explained sum of squares to the total sum of squares. (which ranges from 0 to 1) and hence a large number (0.9) would be preferred to (0.2).