answersLogoWhite

0

Scientific debates let scientists work out different views. Debates present differing ideas and views with that scientist's "scientific evidence", but scientists do not always agree and cannot always resolve the problem(s). Debates are like a think tank. They generate more ideas than declaring one solution or answer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the scientific change the way scientists did their work?

they relied more on evidence


Scientists use to organize questions and reach conclusions that are backed by scientific evidence and research?

the Scientific Method


How did the scientific revolution change the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


How did the scientific revolutions change the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


How did the scientific revolution changed the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


When are scientific ideas modified-?

Scientific ideas are modified when evidence is found that does not fit the predictions. The scientists determine why and revise the model to fit the new data.


Is there any scientific proof that orcas are different species?

Scientists report finding strong genetic evidence supporting the theory that there are several species of killer whales in the world's oceans.


When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?

Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.


Advantages of scientific research?

Scientific research provide factual evidence to questions that scientists have. The research can lead us closer to mysteries about the world and galaxies.


Who are the scientists working with global warming?

The work of 15 climate scientists is helping to educate the public about the overwhelming scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.


How can the Scientific Revolution be seen as a conflict between authority and evidence?

The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.


What is the work of the scientists?

The scientific analysis of crime scene evidence with a view to establishing factually how a crime has been committed.