A law which conflicts with a constitution is said to be unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional
True
Anytime a judge has a conflict of interest in a lawsuit he should recuse himself. Reasons a plaintiff can ask for recusal include the judge is related to, is a friend of or a business partner with defendant. Or if the lawsuit is against a company the judge has invested in and a judgment against the company might harm his investment. Or that the judge had worked with defendant's law firm or been partner's together. Or that there had been some altercation or disagreement between plaintiff or plaintiff's lawyer and the judge do that it might appear that the judge would be prejudiced against the plaintiff. Lawyers and judges are expected not only to avoid improprieties like those but also to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This means that even if an investigation into an alleged conflict of interest shows no actual conflict of interest, the judge should probably recuse himself if it appears to be a conflict.
Anytime a judge has a conflict of interest in a lawsuit he should recuse himself. Reasons a plaintiff can ask for recusal include the judge is related to, is a friend of or a business partner with defendant. Or if the lawsuit is against a company the judge has invested in and a judgment against the company might harm his investment. Or that the judge had worked with defendant's law firm or been partner's together. Or that there had been some altercation or disagreement between plaintiff or plaintiff's lawyer and the judge do that it might appear that the judge would be prejudiced against the plaintiff. Lawyers and judges are expected not only to avoid improprieties like those but also to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This means that even if an investigation into an alleged conflict of interest shows no actual conflict of interest, the judge should probably recuse himself if it appears to be a conflict.
The U.S. Constitution guides the process for confirming a federal judge, but does not specify qualifications. Notably, a federal judge is not required to possess a law degree unless he serves as magistrate or bankruptcy judge. In most cases, those who assess judicial candidates apply their own criteria. As such, presidents and members of Congress develop their own standards for federal judgeships.
There was conflict between the least populated states and greatly populated states in terms of representation. If too much representation was given to the big states, the smaller states there would be an imbalance of power. In addition to this, there was also conflict between those who wanted slaves to count for representation power. The result of that conflict was the Three-Fifths Compromise. In many senses, the constitution was a compromise on many fronts.
There was conflict between the least populated states and greatly populated states in terms of representation. If too much representation was given to the big states, the smaller states there would be an imbalance of power. In addition to this, there was also conflict between those who wanted slaves to count for representation power. The result of that conflict was the Three-Fifths Compromise. In many senses, the constitution was a compromise on many fronts.
all those not designated to the federal government by the constitution as long as state laws do not conflict with national laws(WRONG) The correct answer is Reserved Powers.
rigid constitution are those constitution that can not be changed why FLEXIBLE constitution are constitution that can be changed through a process of amendment
No. The Constitution is silent about qualifications for federal judges. There are also no statutory (legal) requirements for appointment to the Judicial Branch; however, those in charge of the selection process have adopted stringent, informal criteria for selecting appropriate nominees.
The Wyoming constitution is created to govern the state of Wyoming while the US constitution deals with national issues. As such, state laws like those stipulated in the Wyoming constitution are only applicable where they don't conflict with the US constitution and not vice versa.
The main topics of the U.S. Constitution, such as those which describe the branches of government are called the ARTICLES of the Constitution.
Federalists