Politically, all the politicians are in great danger and war is the leading cause of death and is a great health hazard. Secondly, if all the people are dead, there would be no one left to argue incessantly over politics, which would lead to eventual collapse of politics since politics is founded upon people arguing incessantly.
Socially, all people die. No more society.
Economically though, civil war is actually good for the economy! this is because there would be no more economy after a while, which is good for it.
The American Civil War was the most deadly and arguably the most important event in the nation's history. Sectional tensions enshrined in the Constitution erupted into a brutal war that cost over 600,000 lives and cleaved a nation in two. Slavery was a root cause of the conflict, and while the Thirteenth Amendment ended the practice, race relations continued to dominate American politics and society well into the future. The war also increased American economic power until it rivaled, and then surpassed, that of all other countries. And following the war, Americans had a new sense of being a part of a single nation instead of a conglomerate of states with their own institutions and histories.
Northern businesses expanded during the war, and were even more dominant over the ruined Southern economy. Reconstruction did not provide enough impetus for the rebuilding, although massive investments had to be made to restore the infrastructure destroyed during the war.
The most obvious thing is that slavery was ended and the freed slaves became citizens of the United States.
The rise of prices and the North stopped trading with the South.
The crops were burnt, leaving the civilians of closely related towns enevidabley devastated. Politically Lincoln was shot, but government took over for the time being.
Civil Service Commission
loss of natural resources.
Secession- where they thought of their state before their country. Slavery. states' rights. sectionalism. election of 1860.
Political rights, civil liberties for Shiites----mainly political reform and economic improvement for Shiites in Bahrain. The Sunnis are living okay.
States Rights!
More mexicans
Booker T Washington
Rome became dominant in the Western Mediterranean. It had also become embroiled in the Eastern Mediterannean. Although enriched by new possessions, its social and economic structure was damaged and altered by the effects on its citizen-soldiers. These led to an expanding empire and social and political tensions which deteriorated into the civil war.
Patricia J Lancaster has written: 'Construction in cities' -- subject(s): Civil engineering, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Civil engineering, Engineering, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Civil engineering, Management, Political aspects, Political aspects of Civil engineering, Social aspects, Social aspects of Civil engineering
I freaking hate social studies projects!
Political: Everyone was unsettled, no one agreed on anything. Social: Slavery was gone. Economical: Industries were on-hold. The South repaid the North for any damages.
dbqs suck :(
I can't speak for everyone but in my opinion there were two major social effects brought about by the Civil War. One was the beginning of the struggle for civil rights and equality for African Americans along side the opportunity to mend and bring about a more perfect Union which is still being fought today. The other is that the Civil War made the United States a unified Nation. That is One Nation. No north, no south no State sovereignty. We are now and have been ever since The United States of America. The Political effects were the same as with most major events in history and I think even more so today. I see the exposure of these events, the fallen and the social effects used for political purposes that serve politicians and their constituencies. For example, even Abraham Lincoln used the outcome of Antietam to make his case for the Union through the Emancipation Proclamation, which he tactically waited to do until a Union victory was made. Although Lincoln was opposed to slavery, he used the Emancipation Proclamation politically to garner support for the Union cause.
Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.Augustus Caesar was a ruler because he earned the position by winning the civil war, rebuilding the city, bringing a lasting peace to the empire and his other social and political reforms.
Mahatma Gandhi
The Civil War
The Civil War