107.1 MHz has higher energy photons.
The photon energy increases directly proportional to frequency.
However if the station operating on 90.5 MHz transmitter's power is 1.184 times or higher than that of the station operating on 107.1 MHz transmitter's power, then the 90.5 MHz signal will have higher energy because the additional photons makeup the difference. The total energy in electromagnetic radiation is the product of the energy per photon and the number of photons (i.e. amplitude of the wave) in the radiation.
The station with 107.1 MHz would have the longer wavelength.
Because the X-ray has a shorter wavelength (kuch shorter!) the energy is much greater in an X-ray. Therefore with a bigger energy, E = hv would calculate a higher frequency for x rays. As the eregy of a wave increases, so goes the frequency. Actually, it probably should be stated the other way, but I still have answered your question
Objects that are not extremely cold, or very hot, but warm (by space standards). This is because those objects emit radio waves with fairly high intensity, but not too much higher energy radiation, which would interfere.
Sound waves would not ordinarily be converted INTO radio waves.Sound Waves can be used to modulate the radio waves.The radio frequency of a typical FM station is around 100MHz.The audio is used to vary the FM frequency by the range of audio waves, perhaps 100 Hz up to 12 kHz. So the 100MHz signal varies from 100 MHz ± (100 to 12kHz)
No, radio waves are less energetic than gamma rays. This is so because gamma rays have a higher frequency causing the waves to be closer together. However both radio and gamma waves are a form of light (electromagnetic radiation).
If it is a mechanical wave, then the lower amplitude waves would have less energy. If you are talking about electromagnetic waves, then higher frequency waves (shorter wavelength) have more energy, and lower frequency waves have less energy.
mantle
the amplitude of a wave shows how much energy it has eg, a smaller voltage ac supply on an oscilloscope would be much smaller than say a higher voltage such as main electrical pylons. if you mean waves at sea then i would presume it would have to be measured in joules as this the standard SI unit for energy.
ok
chemical energy
Tidal waves are unpredictable. There is no way at present to capture their energy. We can capture the energy of tides and also of waves, but not of tidal waves.
I don't know ow you add energy to the sea but if you could then the tides or waves would rise much higher that may cause Tsunami.
it would be radiation
Mantle or Core but I think its the mantle
That would be "radiation".
Energy comes in different forms; it would help to know what type of energy you are talking about. Energy that can move around includes mechanical waves (for example, waves in water), sound waves, light and other electromagnetic radiation.
You would use more energy in heating and making waves than you would get back.