Replacements for CFCs (dependding on use) included:
We harm the atmosphere in many ways. We smoke, and build things that put chemicals in the are harming the atmosphere. People could make things to keep from polluting the air. We are intelligent people, we can do anything we set our minds to.
Weeds can be removed without harming the environment by plucking the with hands. Allowing them to dry or adding them to ditches for prepration of manure.
The code of ethics for scientists can take many specific forms depending on the type of research. Usually the points include:Not harming people (e.g. not destroying the world to prove the invention works)Not harming the environmentNot hiding hidden problems to make a project supportableNot having a hidden agenda (not being paid by someone for positive results)Not causing unnecessary pain or suffering to people or animalsBeing honest and not fudging the resultsActually doing the work describedNot hiding the results at the request if politicians or supportersAll od these points contribute towards work being done that is honest and useful which can be trusted.
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were emitted during the 20th century from aerosols, refrigerators and other appliances. When CFCs reach the ozone layer (up to ten years later) the chlorine molecules separate and destroy ozone molecules. The chlorine survives and lives to fight again. CFCs can remain in the atmosphere for up to 75 years. CFCs are no longer being emitted to the atmosphere and scientists hope the ozone layer will have repaired itself by 2060.
antibiotic
carbon dioxide
they can't. That is why some people want to ban scientists testing on animals because the animals always end up getting hurt or in some cases even dying
Landfills are where garbage waste goes to sit and rot. A disadvantage to a landfill would be the atmosphere harming fumes and gases it would let of yearly.
We harm the atmosphere in many ways. We smoke, and build things that put chemicals in the are harming the atmosphere. People could make things to keep from polluting the air. We are intelligent people, we can do anything we set our minds to.
People are harming Antarctica by global warming.
doubt it but on the corrie website it does say something about john regretting visiting charlottes parents so its a bit of a mystery
yes. drawing blood just means your harming to a higher extent
Give an example when you may be required to discharge the duty of care in order to protect a person from harming themselves or from harming others?
Plastic doesnt biodegrade / break down naturally, and cannot be recycled without using us a lot of energy, and releasing harmful gases into the atmosphere which cause global warming.
Coal, oil and gas. Fossils files are used to produce energy. But lately the causes of global warming are harming the Earth's atmosphere by the gases and oils being burnt.
The Chlorofluorocarbons are harming the ozone layer. They decompose into halogens which destroy ozone.
A man CAN eat a crane. But most cranes are endangered or protected so if a person were discovered harming one or eating one they could be fined a lot of money or possibly do jail time.