0
What type of image does a person see if using a lens as a simple microscope?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which lens of a microscope is responsible for producing a magnified image on the inside of the microscope that is not seen directly by the person using the microscope?
to produce a magnified image, a microscope uses 2 convex lenses which have relatively short focal lengths to magnify small, close objects.
Why Images observed under the light microscope are reversed and inverted?
The microscope you are using is probably old, and it has an odd number of convex lenses between the object and your eye. in addition to enlarging (or reducing) an image, an optical convex lense also inverts the image. If you were to invert the inverted image again, using another lense, then the resulting image will appear upright. So a microscpope with three lenses (most likely the number of lenses in the microscope you are using) inverts the image three times, resulting in an upside-down image. A microscope with four lenses shows an upgright image. That is why modern microscope manufacturers use an even number of lenses in a microscope (and in binoculars).
What can cause an image to appear blurred using a microscope?
The light so bright.
What is the difference between an electron and a light microscope?
A light microscope is a simple microscope that magnifies light that it collects and spread onto a screen digitally or optically. Electron microscopes is a microscope that fire electrons onto a object then it is bounced back to form an image. It enlarges the image when it is bounced back. It is fired consistently to receive a constant image. It is viewed with a electronic screen. When the electron is fired it creates light which bounces back as well. It can magnify much bigger than a optical microscope.
Who in the 1670's was the first person to describe the cavorting beasties that he observed in pond water using a simple microscope he had just developed?
Leeuwenhoek
Who in the 1670s was the first person to describe cavorting beasties that he observed in the pond water using a simple microscope?
Antonn Van Leeuwenhoek, of course.
Is the microscope you will be using a simple or compound microscope?
help you see living thing movecw: I don't think I've ever seen a simple microscope -- maybe a magnifying glass? Compound!
Is the image reversed when you looking at an object using the stereoscopic dissecting microscope?
Henrey's world
Explain why an inverted image is seen under a compound microscope?
The microscope you are using is probably old, and it has an odd number of convex lenses between the object and your eye. in addition to enlarging (or reducing) an image, an optical convex lense also inverts the image. If you were to invert the inverted image again, using another lense, then the resulting image will appear upright. So a microscpope with three lenses (most likely the number of lenses in the microscope you are using) inverts the image three times, resulting in an upside-down image. A microscope with four lenses shows an upgright image. That is why modern microscope manufacturers use an even number of lenses in a microscope (and in binoculars).
Why are the images under the light microscope are reversed and inverted?
The microscope you are using is probably old, and it has an odd number of convex lenses between the object and your eye. in addition to enlarging (or reducing) an image, an optical convex lense also inverts the image. If you were to invert the inverted image again, using another lense, then the resulting image will appear upright. So a microscpope with three lenses (most likely the number of lenses in the microscope you are using) inverts the image three times, resulting in an upside-down image. A microscope with four lenses shows an upgright image. That is why modern microscope manufacturers use an even number of lenses in a microscope (and in binoculars).
What did Albert Einstein contribute to the atomic theory?
Albert Einstein was the first person to ever be able to show a way to prove the existence of atoms. He did this by using a simple microscope.
Why would using a microscope for observation be more advanced than using a simulated computer model?
Because a simulated computer model is based on historical data. A microscope gives you a 'real time' image.
