As with any major war, there were many firsts and many innovations. Perhaps the most dramatic IMO was the German combined arms effort. Of course, combined arms had been around for centuries, but the German combination of mobile armored formations, fast moving infantry, ground support air craft, commandos, artillery, paratroopers, etc. was an immense step up and made the German military the most efficient the world had ever seen. Modern armies such as the US Army are modeled on this concept. At sea the first true submarines were manufactured, again a German innovation. There had been subs before for about 150 years, but they were all really just surface ships that could temporily go under water. These possibly war winning machines had been invented by 1940 but were ignored for production until mid 1944. Also at sea were the massive air craft carrier ships. These were largely the innovations of the Japanese and American fleet commanders. The British had some AC too, but their leadership in the field was lacking as they mainly used their ships for tactical combat. The American/Japanese fleets both used them for the much more important strategic role, where they were used to gain control of vast areas of sea/land areas. They are still used in this capacity today by the Americans. Coming late in the war and only used in one theatre, were the atomic weapons. They obviously did alter the last few weeks of the war's course between Japan and the USA, but otherwise had little effect on the overall course of WWII. It is interesting too the weapons that were not used........IMO the major one being the huge German stockpile of chemical weapons which included about half the world supply including vast amounts of nerve gas. These were never used or even deployed that I know of. The USA also had some of these weapons and had begun stockpiling them in the Italian area in 1944 presumably to be used against German forces. To my knowledge they never were.
Naval warfare in the Mediterranean during World War I happened in 1919-08.
there were many changes between the weapons in world war one and world war two, in world war two we now have the atoimic bomb, also the guns were better and have longer range.
Warfare in World War 2 are illegal and dangerous than warfare in World War 1.
All the people were set to work in factories building and making military supplies for the war.
ww1 was fought in Europe there was not much significant changes in the rest of the world
World War 1 introduced aerial warfare with airplanes and trench warfare
As important as any other warfare. Most of World War I was trench warfare, though. Air warfare was just starting.
in world war 1 warfare was mainly fought in the trenches and in world war 2 there was alot of invasions and bombing.
In WW1 there was a trench warfare. In the 2nd there was a different style of warfare. Like Urban Warfare or Blitzkrieg
Modern warfare is better than world at war but the best is modern warfare 2. I agree
World War 1 changed warfare by stimulating research into better ranged attacking and aerial warfare. This was because of the stalemate caused by trench warfare.
World War 1 was fought mainly with trench warfare but in World War 2 bombs, tanks, and chemical warfare changed the game.
Modern Warfare 3 IS World War 3.
Trench warfare was one of the new forms of warfare introduced during World War 1. Another new form of warfare was chemical warfare.
trench warfare chemical warfare
The nature of warfare in World War 1 was mostly fighting in the trenches. It was also the first war where we had tanks and airplanes.
Trench warfare was taking place during World War I. Both sides fighting in the first World War used trench warfare as a defensive tactic.
Modern Warfare 2 no doubt about it.....i acctully have both and the graphics of world at war just suck compared to modern warfare 2
Trench warfare and chemical warfare
warfare is never good
rules of warfare