answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

which of the following was not a source of tension between eastern orthodox church

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

You did not include "the following".

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Yanira Gutierrez

Lvl 2
4y ago

Idk

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was not a source of tension between the eastern orthodox church and roman orthodox and Roman Catholic Church?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was not source of tension between the eastern orthodox church and roman catholic church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


What was not source of tension between the eastern Orthodox church and the Roman Catholic Church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


Was not a source of tension between and eastern orthodox church and Roman Catholic Church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


Is the eastern orthodox church and roman catholic church's disagreement about weather or not priests should be allowed to marry a source of tension between them?

Any disagreement is, by definition, a source of tension.


What was not a source of tensions between the eastern orthodox church and Roman catholic church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


What was not a sense of tension between the Eastern Orthodox church and Roman Orthodox church?

The Literal Presence Of Christ in the Blessed Sacrament.


What was not a source of tension between the orthodox church and roman catholic church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


What was not a source of tension between the eastern church and the Roman Catholic Church?

Your question is too general. There are many things that were not a cause of tension between these belief systems. The colour of my dog for instance


Tension between which two blocs caused the Cold War?

Eastern and Western


What is the effect of reformation to England?

It brought more religions to the country (catholic and protestant) and there was a tension between the Catholic and protestant.<3


Was praying over icons and disagreement about whether Christ was the son of God a source of tension between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches?

Although in practice icons often were (and still often are) objects of worship among Orthodox believers and several of them were and are believed to have supernatural powers, the official teaching of the Orthodox Church is that they are not sacred object of worship. In that sense there is or was no difference or tension between the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Church. Roman Catholic teaching also does not consider statues of the Virgin and other Saints as holy object of worship, and exactly as among Orthodox believers, many devout Catholics do nevertheless pray to those statues and attribute supernatural powers to some of them.Nor was there any difference on the issue whether Jesus was the Son of God. There was however a subtle difference on the issue of the Holy Spirit: Orthodox teaching holds that Father, Son and Holy Ghost are 3 separate 'persons', with the Holy Ghost being linked to only the Father. Catholicism sees the three as a "Trinity", and has the Holy Ghost linked to the Father as well as to the Son.No; basically the schism was caused by a power struggle, pure and simple. The Eastern Roman Emperor totally rejected the claims of what he considered just the Bishop of an impoverished and politically negligible city like Rome (which the Pope was, at the time) of "universal jurisdiction" over all Christians. Meaning that his Empire, his Church and even he himself should be subject to said bishop. So instead, the Emperor created the "Orthodox"church organization in which the church's highest cleric was answerabele to him instead of the other way around.


How did the relationship between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church change in 1054?

Catholic AnswerRoman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the Catholic Church. .The Eastern Orthodox Church did not exist before 1054. In that year, most of the Eastern Rites in the Church split. The half that stayed with the Catholic Church are called Uniate Rites, the half that made their own Church are referred to as Orthodox.from A Catholic Dictionary, edited by Donald Attwater, Second edition, revised 1957The Schism of the East the estrangement and severance from the Holy See of what is now called the Orthodox Eastern Church was a gradual process extending over centuries. After a number of minor schisms the first serious, though short, break was that of Photius; from then on tension between East and West increased, and the schism of Cerularius occurred in 1054. From then on the breach gradually widened and has been definitive since 1472. There was a formal union from the 2nd Council of Lyons in 1274 until 1282, and a more promising one after the Council of Florence from 1439 to 1472. After the capture of Constantinople it was in the Turkish interest to reopen and widen the breach with the powerful Roman church; the patriarchates of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem were dragged into this policy, Russia and the Slav churches stood out the longest of any: none of these churches, except Constantiople itself in 1472, formally and definitely broke away from the unity of the Church. But in the course of centuries the schism has set and crystallized into a definite separation from the Holy See of many million people with a true priesthood and valid sacraments. The origins, causes and development of the schism are matters of much complication, still not fully unraveled.