At the end of World War II, few questioned Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans accepted the obvious reasoning: the atomic bombings brought the war to a more timely end. They did not have a problem with over one hundred thousand of the enemy being killed. After all, the Japanese attacked America, and not the other way around. In later years, however, many have begun to question the conventional wisdom of "Truman was saving lives," putting forth theories of their own. However, when one examines the issue with great attention to the results of the atomic bombings and compares these results with possible alternatives to using said bombs, the line between truth and fiction begins to clear. Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was for the purpose of saving lives and ending the war quickly in order to prevent a disastrous land invasion.
The attack on Hiroshima marked the last days of the war in 1945. It also marked the beginning of the nuclear age.
No
No.
Yes. The Atomic bombing of Nagasaki, after Hiroshima, is the final act of WW2
See: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Yes, the Hiroshima bomb was with uranium 235.
No
The bombing of Hiroshima was only one bomb. It was the atomic bomb called little boy.
Hiroshima 66,000 dead
Hitler had no connection with the bombing of Hiroshima, and in fact, was dead at the time. You need to do some reading on history.
Nuclear science was used in the bombing of Hiroshima.
1945
No.
Hiroshima was a large city. Several hundred thousand people were "in" the bombing. You need to be more specific in your question.
Yes. The Atomic bombing of Nagasaki, after Hiroshima, is the final act of WW2
Well, I did not- but the bombing of Hiroshima was August 6. 1945.
Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park
The bombing of Hiroshima brought us to the atomic era. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the last attacks in World War Two. Japan surrendered after the attacks.