Worcester v. Georgia, 31 US 515 (1832)
In Worcester v. Georgia, the US Supreme Court decided the states (in this case, Georgia) had no right to redraw the boundaries of Native American territories, or to require white people to purchase a license to live on the land. As a result, the lower court decision convicting eleven missionaries of violating state law by refusing to purchase a permit to live on Cherokee land was reversed.
The seven-member Supreme Court, lead by Chief Justice John Marshall, voted 6-1 on March 3, 1832, to overturn the missionaries' convictions.
Majority: John Marshall joined by William Johnson, Gabriel Duvall, Joseph Story, and Smith Thompson.
Concurrence: John McLean
Dissent: Henry Baldwin
For more information about the case, see Related Links, below.
Yes he did
defiant.
Worcester v. Georgia (1832)
Worcester V. Georgia (1832)
In response to the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v Georgia that Georgia had no right to interfere with the Cherokee, President Jackson disregarded the decision and removal of the Cherokee proceeded as planned.
Jacksons response: "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."
The agreed ruling of more than half of the Supreme Court justices is called a majority decision.
The Arizona Supreme Court is the state supreme court of the U.S. state of Arizona. It consists of a chief justice, a vice chief justice, and three associate justices.
SevenThe number of justices that serve on the Georgia Supreme Court is 7. The member that has been there the longest is Robert Benham.
well.....my dick
By a nonpartison election
Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia. This was significant because Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court's decision which said that Georgia couldn't make laws that broke the terms on the authority of which the Cherokee's have the right to govern themselves on. Many people ask can he ignore the Supreme Court? Or, Why didn't the Supreme Court do anything about it? And do you know what I would say. idk. :)