answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) established the importance of informing defendants of their legal rights before they are arrested in order to ensure due process.

The Miranda vs. Arizona case was significant because it established that many Americans did/do not know their rights granted to them by the Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments, although only the first eight are triable), especially those pertaining to police investigation and trial, and that when arrested people have the right to be informed of these very significant rights.

The Court decided a confession is involuntary unless the person is clearly informed of his or her right to remain silent, to have an attorney present during questioning, and have an attorney provided free if he cant afford one. Miranda didn't have a lawyer present when questioned and wasn't aware this was an option; therefore, his confession was excluded from evidence and the conviction was overturned.

Case Citation:

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

First of all - it is NOT a law. It refers to a ruling of the US Supreme Court, which declares that prior to any investigative questioning an arrestee must be advised of their right to counsel.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The purpose of the Miranda v. Arizona finding is that the suspect know their rights and not incriminate themselves unknowingly. They must be informed that they have the right to remain silent if they choose to do so and have the right to an attorney.

This is crucial in the world of policing by today's standards.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What does the Miranda vs Arizona law mean?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What changed the law enforcement across the country?

miranda vs. Arizona


What is the name of the Supreme court case that changed law enforcement across the nation?

Miranda v. Arizona


The case that established rights that are read at the time of the arrest was vs Arizona?

Miranda v. Arizona


What was Arizona's side in Miranda vs Arizona?

arizona said that miranda was arested before so he knew his rights


Who authored the majority opinion in Miranda vs Arizona?

Earl Warren


What landmark Supreme Court case established the right of the accused to know their rights?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) was the landmark Supreme Court case in which the court declared that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, (which also applies to the states through application of the Fourteenth Amendment) required that before law enforcement officers attempt to interrogate the accused, they inform the accused of their rights. These rights are now referred to as Miranda rights.


Which Supreme Court case established to that accused must be read their rights?

Miranda v. Arizona


When did the Miranda rights happen?

Miranda vs. Arizona was decided upon by the US Supreme Court on June 16, 1966.


Which US Supreme Court case established the rights that are read everytime at the time of an arrest is?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona


When did Miranda rights start?

The Miranda rights themselves are a part of the amendments to the Constitution. They became "the Miranda rights" and it was required that they be read to suspects in 1966. This was decided in the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona.


Why is the case Escobedo v Illinois important?

It affirmed the right to an attorney and was a case that led to the Miranda Rights that came about in Miranda vs Arizona.


What was the name of the 1966supreme court case which defended the rights of those being arrested?

Miranda vs Arizona