They were very heavy and cumbersome, making them difficult to transport. Additionally, they were water cooled, meaning a supply of water for the machine guns had to be kept on hand.
Feeding stoppages.
The most common deaths in the trench warfare were shot by machine guns, afterwards to solve the problems of the machine guns tanks were introduced
Yes, they did have machine guns in WW2
Yes, machine-guns are long range weapons!
Not actual machine guns, but something of a predecessor to it - the hand cranked Gatling Gun.
No. Machine guns are fully automatic. With Gatling guns, you have put in bullets and crank at the same time but with machine guns, you have to put in bullets, place them on the ground and let them activate and they will open fire. Gatling guns cannot fire automatically, you have carry them and hold them so they can fire. Machine guns are much better than Gatling guns because they can fire thousand of rounds per minute, faster, powerful and can automatically open fire.
The most common deaths in the trench warfare were shot by machine guns, afterwards to solve the problems of the machine guns tanks were introduced
Early Spitfires had 8 machine guns. Later models had 4 20mm cannon.
Early machine guns such as Maxim and Vickers were water cooled and had distinctive jackets around their barrels, except models intended for installation on airplanes. Most later machine guns are air cooled to make them lighter and more portable.
Early Spitfires had 8 x 303 machine guns. Later models had 4 x 20mm cannon.
No. Machine guns will beat Gatling guns.
Machine guns.
Yes, machine guns are better than Gatling guns because they fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns need to have bullets and have to be hand cranked at the same time but machine guns does not need to be hand cranked. Machine guns only need bullets.
Yes, machine guns were used in WW2.
Yes. There were machine guns in WW1. There were Gatlin Guns, a type of machine gun, in the Civil War.Yes
One or more mounted machine guns is a "nest."
Machine guns didn't cause wars.
Some machine guns are and some are not. The answer would be yes and no.