All changes to the confederation would have to be unanimous from thereon.
Well, it doesn't necessarily change, it's a completely different thing but it states different laws or rules, states that the states are not independent, and the three branches of government.
Absolutely nothing. There us nothing that need be changed. Why change something that doesn't need to be changed
Because the colonists did not agree with some of the stuff in the Articles of Confederation
First off, pooop.
In a sense.The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
There were a number of problems with the Articles of Confederation. Some of the weaknesses included the Congress lacking power to collect taxes, the national government could not regulate trade among the states and so many more.
Some of the problems were "No Army/militia" "No federal Government" and no trading can be done
Because the colonists did not agree with some of the stuff in the Articles of Confederation
To discuss revising the Articles of Confederation.
they described it as a weakness to some of the governments well to the executive branch the executive branch didnt like the articles of confederation
First off, pooop.
ham
First off, pooop.
Under the Articles of Confederation, states were allowed to have their own armies, much as the individual colonies had their own colonial militias.
To discuss revising the Articles of Confederation.
To discuss revising the Articles of Confederation.
Winning the Revolutionary War, soon after that we drafted the Constitution.
In a sense.The Constitutional Convention, in itself, did not replace the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was created at the Convention and it was based upon some of the ideals that the Articles of Confederation had, but had changed many things.So, in a sense, no. The Constitutional Convention did notreplace the Articles of Confederation, but the Constitution that was created then did.
There were a number of problems with the Articles of Confederation. Some of the weaknesses included the Congress lacking power to collect taxes, the national government could not regulate trade among the states and so many more.