answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One of the arguments for not having a Bill of Rights was the thought that it would be misconstrued to mearly be a list of your rights. There should be further information on this debate in the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Primary federalist, James Madison believed that a Bill of Rights to protect citizens was unneeded because the proposed constitution gave no powers to the federal government to take upon itself, the rights already granted to citizens by way of the state constitutions. The proposed Constitution was given no rights to take away citizen rights already in existence.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

the main arguments against the tatification on the constitution was the the bill of rights to secure ratification and federalisim.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

because they wouldn't allowed male puppies into the country because all of the illegal aliens

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

read the social studies book

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were some arguments against ratifying constitution and the bill of rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What papers were written to win the support for the ratifying of the Constitution?

Bill of Rights.


Which complaint was greatest barrier to ratifying the constitution?

It did not include a Bill of Rights.


What does the editor of this newspaper support ratifying the constitution?

The editor of the newspaper supports ratifying the constitution because it provides a framework for governing the country, protects individual rights, and establishes a system of checks and balances. They believe that ratifying the constitution will help create a more stable and unified nation.


What was the principal motivation for drafting the bill of rights?

To Protect the rights that were not specified in the Constitution. In my opinion it also was a compromise for the Anti-Federalists, since this was main reason for not ratifying the Constitution.


What were arguments against ratifying the constitution?

it did not guarantee basic rights


Why did the Massachusett ratifying convention propose that a bill of rights be added to the constitution?

They proposed a series of amendments to guarantee citizens' rights.


What was the name of the work Madison co-wrote in defense of ratifying the Constitution?

The bill of rights. ithink...........


Why did the anti-federalist not like the constitution?

The Anti-Federalists did not like the new strength the central government would possess. Additionally, the constitution did not have a Bill of Rights when the states were in the ratifying process.


What are arguments for amending a Bill of Rights to the original Constitution?

The argument for adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution was to protect individual freedoms of the citizens.


What were the arguments for and against including the bill of rights in the body of the constitution as opposed to adding these rights at the end of the document?

People of the convention argued that if we don't include the bill of rights in the Constitution, it would open doors to tyranny in the government. But in my opioin, our government is already crap so.


What do these headlines demonstrate about the process of ratifying the Constitution?

The constitution had strong support but also strong opposition


Arguments against the adoption of the constitution?

There were many arguments made against the adoption of the United States Constitution. The most widely expressed argument was the fact that a centralized government system could weaken the rights and freedoms of the people throughout the country that the document was intended to provide for.