Kings were rules of specific lands whilst Knights were normally men who served his sovereign or lord as a mounted soldier in armour.
Knights, kings, and damsels in distress.
No, they were pretty well off. They were given estates by the kings, got booty from conquests, and earned honors.
the goverment
Medieval European society consisted of a hierarchy. In order of decreasing levels the hierarchy listed kings, nobles, knights, merchants/farmers/craftsmen, and then peasants/serfs.
Peasants and Knights made their weapons out of wood, iron, and different materials. Knights fought to protect their Kings and to worship their land. That's why they had to build castles to protect their land.
Medieval romances are adventure stories about knights, famous kings, or ladies in distress.
Knights, kings, and damsels in distress.
The peasants or serfs did the farming
Medieval kings had the final say when it came to making their decisions, and did not have be held accountable to anyone. Prime Minsters have to answer to parliament, and cannot pass decisions at their whims and fancies.
The occupants of a castle were royal members of society in medieval times such as kings, queens, knights and servants.
The 2nd highest, beneath the Kings and Queens. (ect. Kings and Queens, Knights and Nobles, Lesser Nobles, Freemen and Freewomen, Serfs) wrong knights were below the pope which makes them 3
No, they were pretty well off. They were given estates by the kings, got booty from conquests, and earned honors.
serf, nobles, kings, knights!! i think! :)
the goverment
Knights and Kings
Medieval European society consisted of a hierarchy. In order of decreasing levels the hierarchy listed kings, nobles, knights, merchants/farmers/craftsmen, and then peasants/serfs.
In medieval times, I'm sure the Japanese ate sushi. Knights, kings, queens, and those kinds of people, didn't even know sushi existed.