The tenor of your question indicates that you think that it was all one way. It wasn't. The union and management would enter into negotiations; give and take until an agreement that both sides could live with was achieved.
Obviously, management had it all their own way before collective bargaining. This resulted in grossly unfair wages and practices. Some of the worst were in the mining industry. Basic safety procedures were ignored by management because it affected, in the most miniscule way, their bottom line. And to its shame, the government sided with the owners rather than its citizen workers.
They would send in troops to break up strikes. The companies would hire thugs to descent upon workers and beat them up and terrorize them into submission.
The bean counters reasoned that it was easier and cheaper to hire another mine worker after an unnecessary death, than it was to implement safe working practices. Much like the auto industry does when it discovers a safety problem in one of their cars. The bean counters crunch the numbers to determine how much a recall would cost the company as opposed to paying out compensation for a pre-calculated number of deaths as a result of the safety problem. It all comes down to the bottom line.
Fortunately, thanks to industry watch dogs like Ralph Nader and Phil Edmunston, and whistle blowers who leaked auto industry private papers, the companies were taken to task and have cleaned up much of their act.
But, don't kid yourself, they are still only acting in their own self interest; not out of any sympathy for the auto buying consumer.
The road to collective bargaining was not a smooth one. Now a days, when a contract agreement between management and the union is due to expire, they will enter into collective bargaining with the implied threat of a strike as one of their tools to help coerce management to bargain in good faith. If an agreement is not achieved, then a strike is called. Usually, negotiations will continue. If both sides dig in, then a non partisan arbitrator is appointed to help grease the wheels and get the negotiations moving forward.
If all else fails, and the general public is affected, the government will reluctantly legislate the workers back to work. They do this at their peril though, as workers have long memories and will demonstrate their wrath in the polling booth at the next election.
During the Industrial Revolution, some business owners were taking advantage of workers, with low wages, long hours and unsafe working conditions. When a worker approached anyone about these conditions, they were fired or told to take it or leave it, leaving them with no choice but to work through the harsh environment in order to make a living for themselves or their families. Labor Unions were developed to give the workers a voice in the work place. It set up specific laws and rules that the business owners had to abide by or face penalties. It gave workers a way to speak out about unfairness, unsafe environments, and gave them rights such as time off, sick pay and retirement plans. During the industrial revolution, however, unions did not play much of a role, later as the 19th century progressed labor unions emerged as important organizations for workers. Sick pay, as one example was a 20th century benefit.
rake and travel
There were always scabs, people that companies would use to replace the workers who were on strike. Companies would also sometimes harass striking members either by bringing in goons to abuse them or by telling them that they would blacklist them in the field if they didn't come back to work.
Tools to use against slaves.
Don't try if you are not a professional. It demands special tools and special knowledge if it can be done at all.
well they needed labor tools seeds and work animals
Yes, you need the proper tools and labor to install it.
I have my contents covered on my home owners policy.
Depends on the tool. Sears contracts different companies to build different tools. You can usually find the manufacturing company in the owners manual.
After the slaves were freed white plantation owners had to find new ways to work their land. They typically used three methods: sharecropping tenant farming and wage labor. Sharecropping was a common practice in the South. It involved a system where a tenant farmer usually a former slave would work the land in exchange for a share of the crops proceeds at the end of the harvest. The plantation owner would provide the land tools and supplies while the tenant farmer handled the labor. Tenant farming was similar to sharecropping but the tenant farmer was required to pay rent for the use of the land. This allowed plantation owners to maintain control of their land but it often left the tenant farmer in a difficult financial position. The third option was wage labor which involved hiring workers to work the land. This was the most expensive option but it allowed plantation owners to maintain more control over the land and the labor. In the end white plantation owners had to adjust their methods of working the land after the slaves were freed. Sharecropping tenant farming and wage labor were the three primary options available to them and each had its own pros and cons.
Yes under personal property/contents
With patience, sand stone, hand tools and an endless supply of slave labor.