the trees would die because that is what they breathe in to produce oxygen and if there was no more oxygen people would die to
Animals, including man, add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by breathing it out, and by decomposing, when dead. Man also adds CO2 to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas), and by destroying forests.
If there were no animals, including man, then the trees and other vegetation would grow again, with little to destroy them. Trees would absorb and store carbon, and the levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would come down again to more like what they were like before the Industrial Revolution.
A:If there were no animals on earth all of the plants would die because plants need to take in carbon dioxide to live and produce oxygen for animals so all of the plants would die.First, all of the plants would die out. Plants need carbon dioxide to survive. Second, carbon dioxide helps keep our planet warm, and without carbon dioxide the planet would be much colder. Too much carbon dioxide, though, increases the planet's temperature. Third, there would be no soda. The bubbles in the soda that raise are actually carbon dioxide.
If there were no animals on this planet that would cause a decrease in the levels of carbon-dioxide with a simultaneous increase in the levels of oxygen due to the photosynthesis.That would slowly cause a shortage of carbon dioxide leading to the extinction of plant kingdom finally leaving the atmosphere devoid of co2
The earth would be much cooler. Carbon Dioxide is a "greenhouse" gas. It helps capture the heat of sunlight, warming the earth.
There would be no life, because plants depend on carbon dioxide, and animal life depends on plants.
the trees would die because that is what they breathe in to produce oxygen and if there was no more oxygen people would die to
if there is no co2 there would be no plants, if there is no plants,life is impossible on earth.
Levels of carbon dioxide would continue to build up in the atmosphere. Animals are part of the carbon cycle. They take in and release carbon dioxide, but they don't affect the overall amount.
they would live happily ever after...
Death?
Our air quality would improve. Also, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air would be reduced.
Yes. Cutting down trees will increase carbon dioxide levels.
It means that there is more carbon dioxide (unbreathable air) gets in to are air
There would be less Carbon Dioxide In the atmosphere. (APEX)
Carbon dioxide is not an air pollutant. However excessive carbon dioxide release into the atmosphere is a pollutant as it contributes to acid rain
Tho photosynthesis is impossible.
we would all die because of all the carbon dioxide in the air and no plants and trees to take in the carbon dioxide to make oxygen
Air contains oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and other compounds. We take carbon dioxide into our lungs all the time, but our lungs keep the oxygen. However, if you were in a room with ONLY carbon dioxide, you would die--not from carbon dioxide per se, but from lack of oxygen.
When there is too much carbon dioxide collecting in the air and the plants do not use it up, it may grow to toxic proportions. The content of oxygen will reduce in proportion to the amount of carbon dioxide.
8743u03u7
Our air quality would improve. Also, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air would be reduced.
Carbon dioxide is present in the air because plants need carbon dioxide to make food and without carbon dioxide plants would die and eventually the rest of the food chain.
The rate of photosynthesis will increase, if light is not a limiting factor
Ummm... IT WOULD DIE ... how owuld u live with no air
First, all of the plants and trees would die. Then all the animals, including humans; would die.
Carbon dioxide IS air
In an atmosphere of carbon dioxide, warm carbon dioxide would rise. Since carbon dioxide is better than twice as dense as air, it would need to be really hot before it would rise.