One can use a presumption in a court trial only at specific times and occurrences. A mandatory presumption can not be used in a criminal case, but permissible presumptions are allowed.
Regional trial court is the that we use when we are eating with the ambudsman inside the dinning room.
The courts and lawyers. Court reporters sell the transcripts of the trial to the lawyers involved in the cases.
The strict term "standard of review" is related to appellate court matters rather than for courts of original jurisdiction like a federal district court or state trial court. Appellate courts exercise different standards of review of trial court decisions depending on whether they are reviewing findings of fact, determinations of law or trial court decisions of procedure.
No, it's not. A trial in a court is preferable because there are rules for procedure and evidence, conviction or acquittal. In a trial in the media, there are no rules (especially if you use "sources say").
Evidence of a crime can be used regardless of where it is recovered from.
The Lindbergh Kidnap Murder trial, the various Nuremburg War-crimes tribunals (one should use the plural) this was not one courthouse session). The Calley Court-martial, Manson Murders , and closer in time the O.J. Simpson affair all have been candidates for this dubious honor.
If they were dissatisfied with the conduct of the trial, or believe that it's outcome was contrary to law, they can appeal the findings to the next higher court, i.e.: the Court of Appeals.
Sometimes. An appellate court judge or panel can overturn a lower court judge's (or jury's) decision if there are legal grounds for doing so; they can also affirm, or uphold, the decision.In the federal court system, the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts have jurisdiction over cases heard in US District Courts, and have authority to overturn a decision.
Because the images can easily be changed from the original, and there is no negative to which they can be compared.
In the federal system of the United States, a three tier system exists. The state system follows that pattern. At the bottom is the trial court. That court has original jurisdiction. Then above the trial court is an appeal court. The appeal court reviews the actions that occurred in a trial court. So the court of appeal would not have original jurisdiction. (I am always reluctant to use the word never. Someone will always find some arcane situation where it happened somewhere in some situation. I would use the words should never.) The Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction in certain cases involving problems between states. The last time it issued a Writ of Habeas Corpus was 1924.
During a murder trial in Syracuse, a court attendant mistakenly used a romance novel by Nora Roberts to swear in a witness. The mix-up caused some amusement in the court proceedings.
Maryland v. Craig