There was never a time when it was usual for managers to wear street clothes in the dugout. The original reason managers wore the uniform was that back then all managers were also players. so a guy would (say) play third base and manage the team during his playing career. Then he retires from playing, but he's still the manager, so he keeps wearing his old uniform out of habit. There are no more player-managers (the last one was Pete Rose) but by now it's a tradition. Tradition's don't need a reason. Connie Mack, owner and manager of the old Philadelphia Athletics, used to wear a suit and tie in the dugout. As did Dodgers manager Burt Shotton. There's now a MLB rule stating that no person not wearing a uniform, except medical personnel, is allowed on the field of play during a game.
Army clothes (uniforms) are contracted by the US Government to civilian contractors. The same as with the production of other equipment and weapons.
He wore civilian clothes rather than uniforms or royal attire.
The rules with Managers being ejected from the game is that they cannot remain in the dugout so they have to go into the clubhouse after the point of their ejection. However they are allowed to watch the game from stadium seats but they have to be in civilian clothes and cannot be close to their team's dugout.
Gray, or butternut, if they had them at all. Many had civilian style clothes, with parts of uniforms like caps or jackets.
Civilian is a noun and an adjective. Noun: He is a civilian. Adjective: He is dressed in civilian clothes.
Some names for civilian clothes include: Mufti Civies Non-reg
-You cant wear clothes you want to wear -School uniforms can be very expensive -School uniforms can be uncomfertable -You are forced to wear clothes you dont want to wear
In come cases no but schools like that can order their uniforms in big orders which is often cheaper than regular clothes.
If you have to buy uniforms or specific clothes that are only for the job then yes you can.
they just wear regular clothes. they do not wear school uniforms
you shouldn't have uniforms cause they are a waste of time and money... Uniforms are plain simple boring and saren't expressive.. Normal clothes are creative and expressive...
because they are bad
No, they wear normal clothes
Watch out for possible civilian flights in your vector, Raptor Two-Three. I didn't recognize Sister Mary Margaret in her civilian clothes!
Veterans may wear their medals on civilian clothes. The link below gives you information.
it would be more comfortable not to wear school uniforms but if we wear our own clothes then we are more likely to get teased because of the type of clothes or whether its designer etc - i hoped this helped
Uniforms? Many had no uniform (even though George Washington wanted uniforms) and just fought in their everyday clothes (as they also used their own personal weapons).
yes, school uniforms do help students. i myself am a student that goes to a school where you have to wear uniforms and it helps with the teasing and some of the drama. if you wear uniforms, you dont have to worry about a child being teased for their clothes.(:
So all kids are wearing appropriate clothes.
clothes, dresses, clothing, gear, uniforms, outfits, apparel
Clothes=uniforms in the military.
They wear thick clothes to prevent them from being bitten.