The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Bill of Rights, which protects U.S. citizens against self-incrimination, is the basis for our Miranda Rights. However, in order for Miranda to apply, two elements must be present: 1. the suspect is in police custody, AND
2. the suspect is being asked questions by police that are likely to invoke incriminating statements.
Both CUSTODY and INTERROGATION must be present before Miranda applies. A police officer does not have to advise a suspect of their Miranda rights when either of these elements are absent.
Generally:
No Miranda Warning is required if a person is not in police custody. If a person hasn't been arrested the police may question that person and use the answers later if that person is later charged with a crime. There are situations when police have questioned someone while still on the street investigating a crime and the person blurts out a confession.
However, a good defense counsel will work diligently to try to suppress any confession made or information provided before the suspect was "Mirandized".
The Miranda Warning is only issued by a commissioned Law Enforcement Officer. If by "Security Officer", you mean a private security guard, then no, they are never required to issue a Miranda Warning.
No. A Probation Officer is not a Law Enforcement Officer. Only Law Enforcement Officers are required to give the Miranda Warning.
During an investigation, an individual may be put into custody and interrogated. An individual who is in custody (or is not free to leave), and is being subjected to incriminating questions, is required to be advised of their Miranda Rights.
Miranda warnings are required whenever a suspect is subjected to custodial interrogation by the police. They must be read to each criminal suspect before they are interrogated in order to preserve the admissibility of their statements in court.
The Police in the United States are not required to read you, a Miranda warning before or after arrest - UNLESS or UNTIL they actually begin to question you about a crime you are suspected of.
Miranda is only required when there is both custody and interrogation. A person must be in police custody and must be subject to interrogation for the rules regarding Miranda to apply. It is entirely possible for the police to develop probable cause and arrest a person without speaking with them first.
silent
Non-arrest situations. If you arrest someone, you give the Miranda Warning.
It seems to be used this way: Miranda warning, or Miranda rights. Miranda is capitalized because it is the last name of the defendant who sued to bring these rights into law.
No. Miranda is only given if you are in custody AND they are going to interrogate you.
silly
Miranda rights are the rights that all Americans have that are relevant to suspects in investigations. They must be read as a suspect is taken into custody. They include the right to remain silent, and the right to an attorney.Note that there is no such thing as "Miranda Rights". The actual thing in question is termed a "Miranda Warning", since what is happening is a notification of your (already existing) Constitution Rights (under the 5th and 6th Amendments). What the Miranda v Arizona case defined was that police are required to inform you of your 5th and 6th Amendment Rights during questioning after arrest (this required notification is what often confusingly called "Miranda Rights").