double jeopardy in terms of discrimination is the combination
of two subordinate statuses, defined as experienced by women of color. In a way it is two forms of subordinate discrimination 1.) because they are African American and 2.) because they are women
Because he had been acquitted of the murder, the rule of double jeopardy meant he could not be tried again for the crime. Expecting that double jeopardy would apply, the burglar confessed, and was then convicted for a dozen of his other robberies.
killing black peaple
Because of the teams lack of experience, the project was in jeopardy and the manager was worried. His reckless driving was putting the safety of the public in jeopardy. Downsizing by the company meant that many workers' jobs were in jeopardy.
This is ageism and it is discrimination against someone because of their age. This could include getting jobs, housing, and other things.
The final category was Phrases The clue was: In Ancient Rome it was a post where racers changed direction, since 1836 it's meant a moment change occurs The answer was: What is the Turning Point
the prefix anti in anti-discrimination means?
me
Discrimination is defined as distinguishing differences between things or treating someone as inferior based on their race, sex, national origin, age or other characteristics. An example of discrimination is when you can tell the difference between fine wine and cheap wine.
The Final Jeopardy category was HISTORICAL PHRASES The clue for this category was "Before it meant a space between opposing armies, it referred to an execution site outside the walls of London" The answer is What is no man's land More Jeopardy information for the game on this date is available at the related link
it means that someone could be tried twice for the same crime that person commits.
your possibly talking about mom أم
Double Jeopardy did not attach to the retrial in Gideon's retrial because it is a long standing ruling that double jeopardy does not apply to a retrial when the initial conviction has been overturned on appeal unless a retrial in and of itself would constitute an evil the clause was meant to prohibit.The law on this subject is not cut and dried as there are examples where after a successful appeal of either a conviction or even acquittal, a retrial is permitted despite the seeming contradiction to the double jeopardy rule. United States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662 (1896), citing the English common law precedent Vaux's Case, 4 Coke, 44.There is no single reason for this. One is that although double jeopardy attaches before judgment, double jeopardy applies only to final judgments, yet even this rule has its exceptions.Another reason historically is the wording of this provision had been ''No person shall be subject, except in cases of impeachment, to more than one punishment or trial for the same offense.'' This language was changed to eliminate the word "trial" for fear that a reersal on appeal of a guilty verdict would unnecessarily free a guilty party. In addition, it was felt that for the protection of defendants, appellate courts would not set aside convictions for that reason. Thus, reversals of unfair convictions might not be made. The wording that now appears refers only to punishment as opposed to punishment and trial.