Yes. If there is an interest it can cause confirmation bias in the results. Statistics really can be bent to back up amy claim.
Statistical evidence is a set or collection of numbers that prove a theory or story to be true.
the truth i think
Judges should be disinterested, unbiased, as a case's verdict must be produced on evidence, not one's inner feelings.
true
No statistical evidence to support a detrimental statement
There Is not currently statistical evidence available to support this
It is the hypothesis that is presumed true until statistical evidence in the form of a hypothesis test proves it is not true.
It is the hypothesis that is presumed true until statistical evidence in the form of a hypothesis test proves it is not true.
David C. Baldus has written: 'Statistical proof of discrimination' -- subject(s): Actions and defenses, Discrimination in employment, Evidence (Law), Law and legislation, Statistical methods
C. G. G. Aitken has written: 'Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists' -- subject(s): Evidence, Expert, Expert Evidence, Forensic sciences, Forensic statistics, Statistical methods
You are confused - witnesses are evidence.
Bayesian analysis is based on the principle that the true state of systems is unknown and is expressed in terms of its probabilities. These probabilities are improved as evidence is compiled.