prospero & Caliban
Prospero and Ariel or Prospero and Caliban. Bear in mind that the colonialist reading of the play is a twentieth-century gloss. Shakespeare did not think that it was a play about colonialism, nor did his audience. Although we might think that Prospero's enslavement of the locals in the persons of Ariel and Caliban mirrors the enslavement of aboriginal peoples, we do this because we have a vision of colonialism which is warped by the rhetoric of our time. In fact, it was the Spanish colonialists who enslaved the local people, whereas the English just drove them deeper into the bush. In this sense, the type of colonialism practised by the English is not well-reflected in the play viewed as an image of colonialism.
prospero & Caliban
Prospero and Ariel
Ariel
There is no mercenary in The Tempest.
shakespear commentary on colonialism
contact with native populations is rarely and even exchange: the native people are usually exploited.
Prospero and Ariel
Caliban
No. If anything, it is the other way around: the character's name derives from the word.
Ariel
The ma many types of power relationship; the power of colonialism to divide populations
The isolated island setting
There is no mercenary in The Tempest.
The Tempest.
shakespear commentary on colonialism
contact with native populations is rarely and even exchange: the native people are usually exploited.
the tempest
Miranda is a character in The Tempest.