0
Which branch of government has the power to judge the guilt or innocence of individuals or groups accused of breaking the law?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
judicial branch
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who prosecutes people accused of breaking federal laws?
The federal government.
If you were accused of breaking a law in the US which branch of government would you present your case to?
Judicial branch
What is a sentence using innocence?
The suspect was innocent but, the judge thought he was guilty.
What is the name of the group of twelve who decides guilt or innocence of the accused?
Jury.
If you are attempting to get the jury to develop a belief in the innocence of the accused then you are part of?
defense.
If you are attempting to get the jury to develop a belief in the innocence of the accused then you are part of the?
defense.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What are rights of accused?
These are rights intended for individuals accused for a crime.
What are the rights of accused?
These are rights intended for individuals accused for a crime.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or the innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
