In the following order:
Heliocentric theory of the solar system (Aristarchus of Samos, 270 BCE)
Natural Selection (Darwinian evolution, 1858)
Theory of the hydrogen atom (as a small negatively charged particle inside a larger positively charged particle, 1904, the plum pudding model)
Theory of relativity (special relativity, 1905)
Theory of relativity (general relativity's initial paper on the acceleration of objects within the framework of special relativity, 1907)
Theory of the hydrogen atom (as a small particle orbiting the atomic nucleus, 1909, the Rutherford or Planetary model)
Theory of the hydrogen atom (as an "electron cloud" surrounding the atomic nucleus, 1913, the quantum mechanical or Bohr model)
Theory of relativity (general relativity and its ability to warp space-time, 1915)
So heliocentrism was, by about two millenia, the first. Relativity and the model of the hydrogen atom are intricately intertwined, so which came first depends on what you mean specifically.
natural selection is wrong, it was actually the Heliocentric theory that came first. Copernicus was WAY before Darwin.
the heliocentric theory
Thisafdssafasdfdsa
natural selection
Adaptation is the result of natural selection.
by natural selection.
Yes, natural selection is always occurring.
Natural selection can only work on genetic variation that already exists. So mutation comes first, then natural selection.
Yes, by around 50 years. Natural selection was developed in the 1850s-60s. Relativity was developed in 1905.
No. Not by a long shot.
Its NaTuRaL sElEcTiOn if you didn't know.
natural selection
Adaptation does not allow for natural selection: natural selection causes adaptation.
Genetic variation in itself does not 'support' natural selection: it is what natural selection acts upon.
Natural selection is what causes adaptation.
Natural Selection
Natural selection.
Adaptation is the result of natural selection.
No, natural selection is the mechanism that drivesevolution.
That selection was natural.