Capitalism and its followers believe the fault lies within the Federal Reserve.
.
I think you are looking for Gordon Freeman.
Milton Friedman did not believe in government interference. He argued that government interventions took too long, and any economic gains were actually automatically fixed by the market not by government help.
Any from the Austrian or Chicago school of thought.
Milton Friedman or just friedman.
Milton Friedman has certainly been a proponent of this position in modern times, but his importance is equally in the theoretical area of monetary policy. In addition to him, earlier proponents of this position, and those who laid much of the practical, theoretical and epistemological bases for this position include Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek. Ludwig von Mises is often considered to be a steadfast adherent to the Austrian school of economics.
Many economists, especially in the US, would prefer a completely open free market economy, without any government interference in the forms of rules and regulations. However, most people believe there need to be at least some laws in place to prevent things like monopolies or corruption.
This is the belief of Chicago School economists such as Milton Freedman. The counter argument is that Consumers never had true sovereignty. They are the pawns in the game, not the kings. Without regulations, consumers were sold bread with sawdust in it and milk with water and chalk added. They also were subject to exploding Pintos and cribs that killed babies. According to this counter argument, there is no realistic way for consumers to avoid being ripped off if there is no government regulation.
W. Andrew Achenbaum.
Galbraith.
John Galbraith.
galbraith novanet
I would take it as: consumer is supreme; disclaimer - i am not an economist; only an ordinary layman.