They're both descriptions (or interpretations if you wish) of reality as we understand it.
A theory relates to how we understand a thing,
and a "law" just describes how something should react.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
The difference between theory and natural law is that a theory is a framework, while a natural law is a single rule, usually expressed in mathematics. They are not two different stages of acceptance among scientists (as it is sometimes claimed in error); they are two completely different things; a theory does not evolve into a law with when sufficient evidence for a theory has been gathered for example. For example consider: The Theory of Special Relativity <-- Theory Speed of light is constant <-- Law Theory of Electromagnetism <-- Theory Divergence of the Magnetic field is zero <-- Law Quantum Field Theory <-- Theory Conservation of Energy <-- Law
A theory is just an idea of how things work a law is a theory already proven that applies anywhere just depending of the variables used in the law
A natural law is an empirical observation held to be true. A theory explains why the law holds true.
They're both descriptions (or interpretations if you wish) of reality as we understand it. A theory relates to how we understand a thing, and a "law" just describes how something should react.
Original intent is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation.
Literal is a formalist theory of statutory interpretation which holds that a statute's ordinary meaning should govern its interpretation, as opposed to inquiries into non-textual sources such as the intention of the legislature in passing the law.
Well, All the branches do the law interpretation for their own needs and uses. The interpretation made by Legislative branch is called Authentic Interpretation (interpretation made by the author (of law) itself ) But the most important interpretation is the one made by Courts. Especially the interpretation of Constitutional court (in countries where they exist ) or Supreme Courts.This interpretation is final.
Michael L. Chernick has written: '\\' -- subject(s): Religious aspects of Hermeneutics, Rabbinical literature, Judaism, Theory, Criticism, interpretation, History and criticism, Bible, Jewish law, Hermeneutics, Interpretation and construction
Differentiate or compare theory from law
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
interpretation of pressure on kinetic theory of gases
A Theory is unproven, but Laws are proven. Theory becomes law after that theory is proven correct.
Peter Benson Maxwell has written: 'On the interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes 'The interpretation of statutes' -- subject(s): Interpretation and construction, Law, Statutes
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
Sets of assumptions that guide research questions, methods of analysis and interpretation, and the development of theory refer to ________.