Very few marsupials do not have pouches. In Australia, these include the numbat and the red-tailed phascogale. In North America, some species of opossum (not related to the possum) do not have pouches.
Neither the numbat nor the Brown antechinus has a pouch.
The swamp antechinus develops just a flap of skin for a pouch during breeding season. The kultarr and kowari also have just a fold of skin.
The numbat does not have a pouch.
The small, mouse-like antechinus does not have a fully developed pouch, but just a loose flap of skin on its abdomen.
It is not known why some marsupials do not have pouches. The young joeys are still born undeveloped, and have to cling to the mother's underside, secured in place only by the fact that the teat has swollen in tbeir mouth.
Neither the numbat nor the Brown antechinus has a pouch. The swamp antechinus develops just a flap of skin for a pouch during breeding season. The kultarr and kowari also have just a fold of skin.
The numbat of Western Australia does not have a pouch, although it is a marsupial.
No. Marsupials have pouches. Marsupials include kangaroos, koalas, wallabies and so on.
They do not have pouches as they are not marsupials.
Marsupials have baby pouches. Kangaroos, wallabies, possums, and some others.
No. Lemurs are placental mammals, not marsupials, so they do not have pouches.
No. Only marsupials have pouches. Birds lay eggs.
No. Skunks are placental mammals, not marsupials, so they do not have pouches.
No. Mice are placental mammals, not marsupials.
to birth their young in pouches.
It is called a maripul. (Not sure if that's the right spelling) Marsupials. ^^
Koalas and kangaroos are both mammals with pouches in which they rear their young. They are marsupials, and almost all species of marsupials have a pouch for this purpose.
No. Kinkajou are not marsupials, which are primarily the animals which have pouches. Kinkajou are placental mammals.
marsupials.