0
Which problem is associated with the debate about nuclear power of chernobly?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Acid rain is the answer because radioactive energy is released into the air causing air pollution, which causes acid rain.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What state of matter is francium?
At room temperature it is just about a solid. However, its melting point is very low and will become a liquid at about 25oC. NB You will not find Francium in the open lab., because it is radio-active.
Who invented laboratory thermometers?
There is debate on who invented the first laboratory thermometer especially since there different kinds invented at different times. However, many think the credit should go to Italian professor, doctor, and physiologist Sanctorius for the air thermometer in 1612.
Why br3 and I3 stable while F3 is not?
The trihalide ions I3- and Br3- are well known. They are the smallest members of groups of polyhalide ions In- and Brn- The Iodine groups is the best knwn. In comparison only F3- has been isolated and that has proved unstable. A simple explanation is that bromine and iodine have d orbitals which can take part in the bonding wheres fluorine does not. However these compounds have caused a lot of debate and there is no clear cut concensus on the bonding mechanism. If you are really inetested in this follow links to hypervalency, three center 4 electron bonds, Musher.
What does auxiliary valence mean?
This is an old term used by Werner (1866-1919) in a description of the bonding of transition metal complexes. As an example in the complex CoCl3.6NH3 he proposed that Co bonded to the 6 ammonia molecules using its "auxiliary" or secondary valence and to the chloride by its main valence. Up until then there was debate as to how Co with a valency of could attach 6 NH3 in addition to bonding with 3 Cl. This essentially the model that is now accepted and we term NH3 as ligands and the Co(NH3)63+ (now known to be octahedral) , as a complex of Co3+ Werner is sometimes called the father of coordination chemistry.
Is nanotechnology hard to study?
Nanotechnology (sometimes shortened to "nanotech") is the study of manipulating matter on an atomic and molecular scale. Generally, nanotechnology deals with developing materials, devices, or other structures possessing at least one dimension sized from 1 to 100 nanometres. Quantum mechanical effects are important at this quantum-realm scale.Nanotechnology is very diverse, ranging from extensions of conventional device physics to completely new approaches based upon molecular self-assembly, from developing new materials with dimensions on the nanoscale to investigating whether we candirectly control matter on the atomic scale. Nanotechnology entails the application of fields of science as diverse as surface science, organic chemistry, molecular biology, semiconductor physics, microfabrication, etc.There is much debate on the future implications of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology may be able to create many new materials and devices with a vast range of applications, such as in medicine, electronics, biomaterials and energy production. On the other hand, nanotechnology raises many of the same issues as any new technology, including concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials,[1] and their potential effects on global economics, as well as speculation about various doomsday scenarios. These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted. so yes quite tricky
What issue associated with nuclear power is the biggest source of debate?
The biggest source of debate associated with nuclear power is the issue of safety. Critics argue that accidents like Chernobyl and Fukushima demonstrate the risks involved with nuclear power, while proponents highlight improved safety measures in newer reactor designs and the potential for low-carbon electricity generation. The ongoing debate revolves around whether the benefits of nuclear power, such as its low carbon emissions and high energy efficiency, outweigh the potential risks.
What does government do about nuclear power debate?
They are thinking with their head
Which issue associated with nuclear power is the biggest source of debate?
The biggest issue associated with nuclear power is determining what can be done with the radioactive waste.
Debate on -Nuclear energy boon or a ban?
As far as I know there is no question of a ban. If nuclear is not used then coal will have to be increased.
Which mythological character is associated with bow and arrows?
Robin Hood! Although there is debate as to whether or not he is a myth.
Debate mediation negotiation and compromise are all examples are what?
Communication. Problem solving.
How do you start a debate about nuclear energy?
If you have a group of people together, start off by saying how much you approve of nuclear power, how much it benefits the earth, and how it should be expanded. This should provoke some discussion.
Why did New Zealand become involved in the nuclear debate 1944-1990?
I doubt if New Zealand knew anything about nuclear weapons in 1944, possibly at the highest level of government but the general public knew nothing.
Is television violence a social problem?
There are many that would argue yes, although it is a heated debate.
What is the problem with using pathos in an argumentative paper or a public debate?
pathos relies on emotion instead of logic
What do nuclear power stations use?
Nuclear Power plants use refined uranium or plutonium. Both of these elements are extremely radioactive and unstable. In order to control the explosive reaction (google atomic bombs), they use control rods in the process to slow the reaction rate, keeping it under control. These control rods, along with all clothing, tools, and other items taken into the reaction chamber become nuclear waste. This is one cause for debate against nuclear energy as there are no means of destroying/disposing of these waste products. But that is a different debate.
Is nuclear energy dangerous to humans?
It's been well proven that large, acute doses of radiation are bad for living tissue. The health effects of small, chronic doses have been the subject of intense debate among the members of the BEIR (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) committee. With respects to the health effects of nuclear power in general, whether your electricity is generated by nuclear, hydro, solar, or windmills, if it doesn't release emissions into the air it has no impact on your health. While nuclear power does produce high level waste which is radioactive (it emits radiation) for a few hundred years, the quantity is relatively small and easily contained. From my personal viewpoint and all things considered, nuclear power is the method of generating electricity of all of them which is the least bad for your health.
