Kentucky was a slave holding state that did not join the confederacy. Lincoln is quoted as having said something to the effect that if he could not win Kentucky he could not win the war. Also, once Lincoln issued the immacipation proclimation, only slaves within states that had joined the confederacy were free, meaning that Kentucky could still legally continue to own slaves.
The Confederacy was made up entirely of slave-holding states. It was their raison d'etre.
Because the majority of their inhabitants wanted to be loyal to the Union.
They were not in favor of succeeding
the Confederacy
The Northern slave-states of Kentucky and Missouri.
union. It was one of the four slave states in the Union
The leaders of the Confederacy believed that the Union states were the enemy. This belief was largely influenced by the slave trade.
The Potomac divided the Confederacy from the Union, although Maryland was a slave-state, and so was DC at the beginning. The Ohio River divided the slave-states from free soil.
The Slave Holding States of the Confederacy.
They were not in favor of succeeding
The Confederacy was not a state. It was a group of states that declared themselves as a nation separate from the United States. The states that joined it were slave states.
the Confederacy
border states
Three states, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri were slave holding states but did not join the Confederacy. Each of these states have complex reasons for remaining in the Union and yet retained their slaves. Tennessee was a slave state and joined the Confederacy. The latter was late, joining the South in May of 1861.
11
The Northern slave-states of Kentucky and Missouri.
In the terms of the 1860's the "border states" were slave holding states that did not join the Confederacy but were allowed to retain their slaves. Geographically, Kentucky and Missouri were a buffer of sorts between the South and the North. Maryland surrounded the city of Washington DC making it necessary to prevent it from joining the Confederacy. Delaware's location and very small slave population were not important.
No. The South was the breakaway Confederacy. The North were the states that had remained loyal to the USA - the Union. (They included four slave-states)
Because he was anxious not to upset powerful slave-owners in the border-states and drive them into the arms of the Confederacy.
union. It was one of the four slave states in the Union