Considering neutron stars are about the size of a city, sub giants are much bigger
Considering a neutron star is about the size of a city, a subgiant is way bigger.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
Both. A subgiant can be a young star (1,000 years old) to an old star (10 billion years old). See related question.
Yes, a solar nebula is much larger than a neutron star. In terms of objects in space, neutron stars are tiny; only a few miles across. A stellar nebula such as the one that formed the sun is light years across.
Yes far bigger. A red giant would cover the distance from the Sun to the Earth. A neutron star could be the size of New York City.
Considering a neutron star is about the size of a city, a subgiant is way bigger.
Yes, a nebula is far larger than a neutron star. A neutron star is a few miles across. A nebula is light years across.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
white subgiant star
very
Both. A subgiant can be a young star (1,000 years old) to an old star (10 billion years old). See related question.
A binary star. The main component is a Be-type subgiant.
Yes, a solar nebula is much larger than a neutron star. In terms of objects in space, neutron stars are tiny; only a few miles across. A stellar nebula such as the one that formed the sun is light years across.
Yes far bigger. A red giant would cover the distance from the Sun to the Earth. A neutron star could be the size of New York City.
A black hole has more mass than a neutron star, but if you are comparing volume it would depend on the mass of the black hole. A neutron star is estimated to be about 14 miles in diameter, which is larger than the event horizon of a black hole up to about 3.8 times the mass of the sun. A more massive black hole will be larger.
Good sentence for neutron star - WOW ! see that;s a neutron star !!
Good sentence for neutron star - WOW ! see that;s a neutron star !!