If you hit a car from behind, you are going to be held to be at fault. If a car hits you from behind, they are going to be held at fault. Most jurisdictions consider hitting the back of a car prima facia evidence that you were following too closely. You could literally have six cars At Fault in this case, each one for hitting the one in front of it.
the cars fault-obviously
You are both at fault you shouldn't have ran into the car and he/she should have had there lights on you are not at fault if it was dark or you couldn't see them
Who is at fault when a vehicle is hit from behind on a freeway the driver in front for putting on there brakes and whatpenal code does it follow under?
The bulb needs changing or theres a wiring fault, you need to go and see an autoelectrician he/she will solve all your problems.
Generally, the person that was changing lanes would be at fault. It would be hard to find fault in the other driver if they were stationary in their lane.
on fault lines. On some fault lines theres accually a visible space and you can see it splitting. I think theres one in Africa and another in California
Without knowing all the details it is impossible to say.Generally, if you hit anything that is stationary you are at fault.
well you would be at fault for changing lanes into then, and they would be at fault for not having a licences
Need more details about the incident, such as whether or not you drifted into another lane, and whether you were bumped by someone changing lanes, someone turning behind you, someone already in the lane you were turning into, etc.
Your insurance will usually only go up if it is determined that an accident was your fault. If someone hit your car when you weren't there, then most likely, you couldn't avoid it and it wasn't your fault. Unless you parked it in the middle of a freeway or something like that.
Generally it's the person who hits from behind.
Theres a fault running right through Summerville, the major earthquake in 1886 that almost flattened Charleston was centered in the Summerville Fault.
it would not be the schools fault . although if the child tells a teacher and the teacher acts careless or does not help out by much it would be the schools fault
HELL no. What is wrong with you? Not only is it insanely illegal but it is extremely dangerous. Remember that you're not the only person on the road. Don't be a selfish person. If you don't get yourself killed you'll probably get someone else injured or killed and yes you'd definitely be at fault for BACKING UP on the freeway.
It is the fault of the person who fell.
Dogs don't have an understanding of "fault" when it comes to changing owners. To a dog, it's as simple as changing their pack and a dog is not hurt by that. Although, it would most likely miss you.
"Who is at fault when someone is backing out of a driveway on private property and you are pulling into the driveway and you get hit?" "Who is at fault when someone is backing out of a driveway on private property and you are pulling into the driveway and you get hit?"
no, it is their fault for not letting you know they were stopping.
Changing lane should be at fault because the driver should be able to control the car against hitting another car. The changing lane driver only has a case if it is illegal to use the side road.
I would have to say that technically it would be the driver pulling out of the parking space. TECHNICALLY speaking that is. The insurance companies would probably try to say it is an equal at fault accident maybe.
Depends WHY they like you.
The person pulling out of the driveway is at fault.
Yes i think that if you are hit in the foot its their fault if you are hit in the stomach, its your fault.
No it is not a no fault state. Ohio is a tort state meaning that someone must be found to be at fault in each accident.
Let them move into our lands. The Earth is changing, whether it is our fault or not.