0
They saw the Christians as a threat to their government.
Kaylee LoVerso
Wiki User
∙ 10y agochristians
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the teachings of Jesus threaten the Romans?
The Romans did not see Jesus as a threat. To them he was an insignificant figure in a small backwater of the Roman Empire (Judea). Jesus was seen as a threat by the Jewish priests, not by the Romans.
How did roman ruling influence American government?
Roman ruling only influenced the American government in the fact that both governments were republics. The American founding fathers certainly studied the Roman government, but could see its flaws and changed them considerably. Many people try to read similarities into the two governments where they do not and can not exist.
What was one religion that roman leaders consisted a problem?
Several Roman emperors considered Christianity a problem. This lead to a number of persecutions. Christianity was at times seen as a threat because it converted previously pagan Romans and it refused to perform sacrifices and augury. Roman religion was seen as a fundamental part of the Roman state. This state was seen as requiring the blessing of Roman gods for it security and welfare. The Romans believed that natural disasters were the result of wrath of the gods. Therefore, the gods had to be appeased by performing sacrifices in their honour. Moreover, actions which would involve public matters or the wellbeing of the state or war had to be preceded by augury. This was the divination of the omens of the gods to see whether they approved or disapproved of the proposed action. Because of this view, the Christian refusal to perform sacrifices and augury was at times seen as a threat to the foundation of the state, a threat which was made worse by the conversion of Romans to Christianity. Some of these Romans were rich people and some were officials in the imperial bureaucracy and court. Thus, the threat could be seen as reaching the core of the state. The attitude of the Christians could also raise the question of whether they were loyal to the Romans state. One of the Christian persecutions (the Decian persecution) was aimed at testing their loyalty. They were required to perform sacrifices and if they did not, they were liable to execution. It had to be noted that not all emeprors took this view and that the persecutions were followed by a return to the long-stading Roman policy of toleration of other religions.
Why does England see Germany as a threat but not the US?
us are allies of the british
Why was consolidated government a threat to America according to Patrick Henry?
Henry never used the phrase "consolidated government." This would have been an alien idea to him. What he knew was government run by Kings and he knew that kings have too much power. That kings rule a world where they step on the rights of others because they see themselves as having "god given" positions.
What elements of roman government can you see in our government today?
All elements
Why did El Savador's government see Oscar Romero as a threat?
because he was a communist
Are all government officials aliens from outer space?
Nope just the good ones you see its a long story so bye
How did the teachings of Jesus threaten the Romans?
The Romans did not see Jesus as a threat. To them he was an insignificant figure in a small backwater of the Roman Empire (Judea). Jesus was seen as a threat by the Jewish priests, not by the Romans.
Why are government officials interested in public opinion?
Because the opinions of the people will affect the public officials' careers and help then know how to help the people they serve.
What made Japan see the US as a threat to the authority in Asia?
America was coming to the aid of the Philippines and Guam and that made Japan see the US as a threat to its authority in Asia. Also, Japan was concerned about the US support of the Chinese government once we started speaking with them again.
Where is the Holy See located?
The term Holy See also means the Pope and the Roman Curia, the central government of the Roman Catholic Church.
How did roman ruling influence American government?
Roman ruling only influenced the American government in the fact that both governments were republics. The American founding fathers certainly studied the Roman government, but could see its flaws and changed them considerably. Many people try to read similarities into the two governments where they do not and can not exist.
Why does the American government not stop Israel from making unpeaceful dialogue with oil rich Muslim countries?
Answer 1High officials in the government of Iran have publicly announced their intention to wipe Israel off of the map. There are many who consider that public statement to have been a monologue, un-peaceful, and not instigated by Israel.Answer 2The US government encourages Middle East regional communication. The Saudis and other Sunni Muslims see Israel as less of a threat than Iran and are willing to reconcile with Israel in secret over this issue. The United States, similarly seeing Iran as a threat, supports both the reconciliation and its aim: to limit Iranian influence.
What does the speaker of the house do to a proposed bill?
The speaker of the house can announce a proposed bill to a committee made up of government officials. The bill can then be voted on to see if it should be passed.
What was the three part government of rome called?
Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.Rome's tripartite government is a modern revision of history. If you read about the Roman republic you can't help but see that it was a bipartite government. They did not have three branches of government. They had two branches of government, the Senate and the Roman People" (SPQR) Although they had Praetors, who were judges, the praetors were members of the senate and had other duties as well. For example, they could govern a province and raise an army. These were the identical powers of the consuls. There was no separate judicial branch of government in ancient Rome.
Why is it important for government officials to file their personal assets upon assuming office?
So that we can see if they are voting in a way that's just to help themselves or if they are doing their job for the people who elected them.
