Britain took part in helping Tibet gain independence from Chinese rule before 1792. However, after 1792, Britain refused to assist Tibet.
well, aside from being a part of China since the yuan dynasty (13th centry), Tibet is reconized as a city of China. Your question its basicly like what claim the US have for New YorkChina saw land and resource opportunity for themselves to take over Tibet. They knew that no one was going to stop them in invading Tibet.
Tibet surrendered but had an agreement to keep its regional self-government, have free religious beliefs, and no immediate change in the government.
china
Should? Well the fact remains that Tibet has been apart of China since the Qin Dynasties which were hundreds or thousands of years ago. China's main goal in the 1980s was to modernize Tibet. Truth is that if Tibet was independent, they would still be living a 3rd world country and they would highly depend on donations to keep them afloat. China is pouring large sums of money into Tibet to make it reliant and if Tibet was to ever claim independance it wouldn't last very long...what would their people do for a living? Pray for food in the temples? WRONG! And the 15th Dali Lama enslaved and killed thousands of people and did worse that what China has ever done. The 15th Dali Lama told his men to kill anyone who wasnt a buhdist from what i heard.
Europe was never imperialized.
jaylen major imperialized latin america in the 19th centurry
Panama has been imperialized by the Spanish in the 1600s and by the Americans since the 1900s.
China was imperialized in 1750. The imperialization of China lasted until 1914. China was mainly imperialized by England, Portugal, France, Spain, and even Japan.
germany
Italy
Portugal
yes.
Great Britain
japan
United States
The prickin whales