Galileo is credited with the first compound microscope. Zacharias Janssen invented the microscope that we use today.
A microscope does not measure anything in any form
Actually, the image doesn't form in the microscope. The image forms on your retinas. The microscope focuses light in such a way that it comes together correctly on your retinas.
Yes, with a microscope. During mitosis, the chromatins condense to form chromosomes, which are visible under a microscope.
The function of the condenser in a microscope is to concentrate the light on the specimen. The condenser is one of the main parts of the optical system in a microscope.
There there are many. Simple microscope, compound microscope, light microscope, scanning electron microscope, TEMicroscope, Dissection microscope, etc and most of them are used to see small cells that cannot be seen by the naked eye.
light microscope
A microscope does not measure anything in any form
The first form of chess was invented in India. The rules of the game we play today were finalized in the 1490's.
If you put it under a microscope, you will be able to see the heterogenous mixture form into different parts. Opposed to this, the homogenous mixture will look similar throughout the entire mixture - also when put under a microscope.
For an optical microscope, the principle of refraction, in its lenses.
Animals aren't invented!They can be crossbred to form a new breed but that only works with animals of similar or the same species. So nobody can invent a chinchilla.
in 1830 the Scotsman John Loudon Macadam invented the first form of tarmac called Tarmacadam. the tarmac we know today was made in 1901.
WK Kellogg invented the flakes of the cereals, the form in which we eat it for breakfast today. earlier, it was produced in a gummy and wet form.
No, the word 'microscopic' is the adjective form of the noun 'microscope'. Example: There were microscopic particles in the sample. (describes the noun 'particles')
Short answer: Zacharias Jansen Long answer: Your question is not valid for 2 reasons: 1. You cannot "discover" something if it does not exist. You should be asking who invented it, not who found it laying around somewhere. 2. A "simple microscope" is not common terminology. Simple compared to an electron microscope? or simple compared to a compound microscope? What is typically referred to as just "microscope" is technically a compound microscope. A set of multiple lenses mounted in a desktop style that allows the compounding of magnification. A compound microscope is the standard microscope in any basic lab setting. Anything more "simple" than a compound microscope would not even really be a microscope, it would either be a telescope, or simpler than that is a magnifying glass (with a single lens) The inventor of the magnifying glass was: Roger Bacon The next step up is the telescope invented by: Zacharias Jansen The next step up is the "compound microscope" which was also invented by: Zacharias Jansen (this is the simplest form of what would be recognized as or named "microscope") If you wanted to go even "simpler" and define microscope as anything that magnifies, there were reading glasses around for thousands of years prior, and even "reading stones" which were lumps of polished glass used to magnify parchment in Egypt as far back as 7000 B.C. (inventor unknown). So it really depends on how you wish to refine your meaning of simple. The magnification of anything? There is no known inventor for reading stones, his name is lost to time. Or if you mean the first invented microscope that could examine things too small for a human eye to detect, that's a compound microscope. Thus if I am guessing your meaning correctly, you meant to ask this question: Question: Who invented the compound microscope? Answer: Zacharias Jansen
The lenses of a microscope form an enlarged image of a specimen.
It.Protect form dust>>>>>>>>....?