the F.O.O.P. branch can reject treaties. they are an underground brach that no on ever considers at first glance, but they control all of the other branches secretly.
Only Congress.
yes, I think so.
According the United States Constitution, the US Senate can refuse the president's appointments. It can also reject treaties that have been agreed to by the president.
Congress can impeach a president (accuse them of a crime), override the president's veto power, and reject his or her treaties.
no
They must meet with the other countries, work out the details and agree to it, finalize the treaty into a bill of sorts, and the Senate must confirm it with a vote of 2/3. Pretty cut-and-dry.
The president makes treaties "by and with the Advice and consent of the Senate,...provided two thirds of the Senators present concur." The Senate may accept or reject treaty as it stands, or it may decide to offer amendments, reservations, or understandings to it.
true
You may be inclined to think that Treaties achieve nothing at all. They are only good for the day on which they are written. Treaties are not necessarily permanent. Treaties allow withdrawal or may forbid withdrawal. Parties may, and often do, violate treaties, so the party in question may be suspended or membership may be cancelled. Treaties may be re-negotiated. Historical Treaties have deprived Natives of their own land without compensation. . On the contrary however, some formal statements between two or more States, parties or even individuals, do allow for a success in peace, commerce and other international relations
Legislative over the execitive
Yes and no