If there are any costs associated with drafting and signing the lease the landlord should pay. That would be part of the costs of having rental property.
If there are any costs associated with drafting and signing the lease the landlord should pay. That would be part of the costs of having rental property.
If there are any costs associated with drafting and signing the lease the landlord should pay. That would be part of the costs of having rental property.
If there are any costs associated with drafting and signing the lease the landlord should pay. That would be part of the costs of having rental property.
If there are any costs associated with drafting and signing the lease the landlord should pay. That would be part of the costs of having rental property.
Full Service Lease - Landlord pays all Gross Lease - tenant pays electricity if it is individually metered. Landlord pays all other expenses.
A security deposit is a refundable deposit that a tenant pays to their landlord before they move into a property As long as a tenant abides by the terms of their lease, this deposit should be returned to a tenant when their lease has expired. There are certain situations where a landlord is allowed to keep all or part of a tenant's security deposit.
No. A lease is a legally binding contract, which obligates both the landlord and tenant to a tenancy for the term of the lease. If you and the landlord both signed a lease, and the landlord refuses to give you occupancy of the property, you need to see a landlord-tenant attorney or tenant's rights group immediately!
The landlord pays tenant utilities. The full service gross (FSG) rental rate includes a set amount that should be allocated towards the payment of utilities, but ultimately it is up to the landlord to pay any and all utilities.
Yes, unless the landlord breached the lease in some significant way.
The landlord or tenant can pay for the tenant improvements
I am presuming we have three components here: a landlord, a tenant, and a subtenant. The landlord in this case is presumably renting to a tenant, while the tenant is presumably renting to a subtenant. I presume that tenant has a lease while the subtenant doesn't. The tenant becomes the landlord for the subtenant. Since there is no lease (in most states subletting does not involve a lease) in this case, the tenant who is the subtenant landlord can evict the subtenant. While the main landlord can evict the tenant -which automatically evicts the subtenant -only the tenant can evict the subtenant. But the main landlord can evict all by evicting the tenant.
Normally the bankruptcy filing has nothing to do with whether or not the tenant has paid his rent. A landlord does not have the right to evict a tenant simply because the tenant filed chapter 7 unless that is part of the lease. The terms of the lease determine if the tenant will be evicted. If the tenant pays the rent, he should not be evicted.
Statutory tenancy means that by law one is a tenant for the property. In most states statutory tenancy occurs when the landlord hands the keys over to the tenant, allowing him to move into the property. No lease is required to be signed for this to happen. And the person remains a statutory tenant as long as he pays his rent and the landlord accepts it.
Yes he can. A violation of the terms of a lease by a landlord is just as much grounds for termination by the tenant. The landlord can still evict you but less likely will win.
In a NNN lease the tenant (person leasing the property) is liable for the taxes, insurance, and CAM (Common Area Maintenance) expenses. In a Gross Lease, the tenant pays a fixed amount of rent to the Landlord and has no other expenses to pay.
It depends. If the sub-tenant was there by right and the landlord allowed a sub-lease, then that's a situation where nothing has gone wrong. If the landlord is suing, it sounds instead like the tenant did not have the right to sublet and in that case they are responsible to complete the lease and the sub-tenant may not have had the right to be there.