The belief that there is no absolute moral orientation, and no absolute right or wrong, is called Moral Relativism. Among the most prominent contemporary philosophical defenders of moral relativism are Gilbert Harmann and David B. Wong. Notable historical philosophers and those of similar profession that proposed and described forms of moral relativism include the Greek historian Herodotus and sophist Protagoras, and the Chinese Daoist philosopher Zhuangzhi.
herodotus
1.To do with right and wrong.(Carl faced the moral dilemma of saying nothing or telling the truth) 2.Good and honest.(A moral person would never lie or cheat.) 3.Your morals are your beliefs about what is right and wrong. 4.The lesson taught by a story.
Since this is a philosophical question, I can only give a philosophical answer. I feel it is better to be wrong for the right reason rather than to be right for the wrong reason. If one is wrong for the right reason, then I feel they at least had good intentions. If one is right for the wrong reason, then I would have to wonder if their intentions were the right ones in the first place. But the really important thing, in my "philosophical" answer, is for one to be able and willing to admit when they are wrong.
you can not be wrong and write at the same time it is impossible
Actually, its I'm big, your small. I'm smart, your dumb. I'm right, your wrong. And there's nothing you can do about it and it if from Matilda/
Sophists
Sophists
herodotus
herodotus
herodotus
yesNoAnswer:There no absolute standards for right or wrong, as a consequence this cannot be answered
The belief that there is no absolute moral orientation, and no absolute right or wrong, is called Moral Relativism. Among the most prominent contemporary philosophical defenders of moral relativism are Gilbert Harmann and David B. Wong. Notable historical philosophers and those of similar profession that proposed and described forms of moral relativism include the Greek historian Herodotus and sophist Protagoras, and the Chinese Daoist philosopher Zhuangzhi.
No. There is no "right way" and "wrong way" of writing pseudo code, let alone qualifying with "absolute". However, a pseudo code is "wrong" if it cannot be understood, or it is incorrect in semantic (what the code tries to describe, solve, etc)
that sophists thought that knowledge was a way to improve ur life and Socrates thought that there was an absolute right or wrong
he was just smart enough to know what was right or wrong
Sophists were a category of teachers who specialised in using the techniques of philosophy and rhetoric for the purpose of teaching.
Sparta