answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)

Chief Justice Earl Warren presided over the Court that ruled 5-4 that defendants' statements could not be used in court unless the accused was informed of his or her right to consult an attorney during questioning. The defendant also had to be advised of the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, and that he or she understood those legal rights and waived them voluntarily.

Majority

Chief Justice Earl Warren
Justice Hugo Black
Justice William O. Douglas
Justice William Brennan
Justice Abe Fortas

Concurring in Part

Tom C. Clark

Dissenting

Justice John M. Harlan II
Justice Byron White
Justice Potter Stewart

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)

Chief Justice Earl Warren presided over the Court that ruled 5-4 that defendants' statements could not be used in court unless the accused was informed of his or her right to consult an attorney during questioning. The defendant also had to be advised of the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, and that he or she understood those legal rights and waived them voluntarily.

Majority

Chief Justice Earl Warren
Justice Hugo Black
Justice William O. Douglas
Justice William Brennan
Justice Abe Fortas

Concurring in Part

Tom C. Clark

Dissenting

Justice John M. Harlan II
Justice Byron White
Justice Potter Stewart

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) was decided during President Lyndon Johnson's administration.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the supreme court justices opinions on Miranda v Arizona?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How many justices are in the Arizona supreme court?

There are 9 supreme justices currently taking place in the supreme court.


The Arizona Supreme Court has nine justices?

No. Seven Justices are appointed by the Governor to serve on the Arizona Supreme Court for a regular term of six years.


Does Georgia have nine Supreme Court justices?

The Arizona Supreme Court is the state supreme court of the U.S. state of Arizona. It consists of a chief justice, a vice chief justice, and three associate justices.


What is the name of the Supreme court case that changed law enforcement across the nation?

Miranda v. Arizona


How do you cite US Supreme Court case in Blue Book Miranda v Arizona and in Westlaw?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


Which Supreme Court decision made this procedure standard?

Miranda v. Arizona


When did the Miranda rights happen?

Miranda vs. Arizona was decided upon by the US Supreme Court on June 16, 1966.


There are justices on the supreme courthow mean justices on the supreme court are there?

there are about how mean justices on the Supreme Court.


Which US Supreme Court case established the rights that are read everytime at the time of an arrest is?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona


When did Miranda rights start?

The Miranda rights themselves are a part of the amendments to the Constitution. They became "the Miranda rights" and it was required that they be read to suspects in 1966. This was decided in the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona.


When Supreme Court justices compose their draft preliminary opinions the main audience they are seeking to influence is?

their colleagues on the court


What was the number of votes in the Miranda vs Arizona decision?

There were two trials, both titled State of Arizona v. Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was convicted at trial and on retrial and appealed both sets of convictions under the title Miranda v. Arizona; the case never went to trial under that name.In the appeal of the first trial, the US Supreme Court held that Miranda's constitutional rights had been violated, resulting in the first conviction being vacated and the case being remanded for retrial with Miranda's confession excluded as evidence.Miranda was subsequently convicted at his second trial. The decision was affirmed by the Arizona Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court denied certiorari for his second petition, making the Arizona Supreme Court decision final.