the egg was
Evolutionist concluded that the egg was first because dinarous layed them before Hens evolved.
Creationist concluded that dinarous and hens came to live in the begining of the world and both were made before the egg.
Since an egg is necessary to produce a chicken and a chicken is necessary to produce an egg, no one knows which came first. Arguments could be made for each, so this makes a great philosophical question to debate.
The chicken came first obviously because what gave birth to the egg.
Ah, the unanswerable question/riddle.
A chicken is born from an egg, but the egg must come from a chicken.
And so, we will never be able to answer this question correctly.
The chicken. God put a chicken on earth, not an egg.
the egg of course
"Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" is a famous riddle that has no answer.
If you believe the story of Noah, then the chicken came first.
Clearly the egg came before the chicken. Inverts, fish, amphibians and dinosaurs were laying eggs long before the first hen existed. And the first hen certainly came from an egg. But, did it come from a "chicken" egg? But i ate the egg Well, that is one theory but who said the hen originally came from an egg? maybe a cross-breed situation occured between two mammals and they gave birth to a hen of somesort then the hen laid an egg. but once again what about the male?
A matter of perspective. By evolutionary theory, the egg came first from something that was almost, but not quite, a chicken. By creationism, the chicken was created by God, and thus eggs came after that.
The hen's egg came first because other animals layed the egg!!!!
The answer is neither because an egg has to be incubated and a chicken needs a mate to reproduce the true answer is two chickens a hen and a chicken.
obviously its the egg! How else would the chike- oh wait... A circle has no beginning.
There is more chance of egg because it is a cell. ________________ The way that you have asked the question leads necessarily to the conclusion that the hen existed before its egg existed, if you are talking about an egg laid by the hen. It leads necessarily to the conclusion that the egg existed first if you are talking about the egg from which this hen developed. You have only to clarify which egg you are talking about, and the conclusion becomes unambiguous. This is different from the classic "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
Hen
egg came first because someone told me that he first made omlate before making a chicken curry
Preferably, the hen came first but then came the chicken. So biologically speaking the hen came first but 4 out of 10 chances, scientists believe that the chicken came first, so they are coming up with various results.
In a literal sense, the chicken. Without the hen, the egg could not be formed nor laid. Therefore, the hen must come first. The question that comes soon after is "Then how was the hen born?" The fact of the matter is chickens were not born, they evolved from other creatures; the chicken has been "in the making" for millions of years. So, in a technical sense, the egg came before the hen; the only thing that came before the chicken was non-chickens, therefore the mutations/combinations had to have occurred inside the egg which gave birth to the hen.